On Thursday 14 March 2019 14:37:16 Curtis Dutton wrote:
> Great thanks for the pointers!
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:32 PM Robert Ellenberg
wrote:
> > Hi Curtis,
> >
> > There are a few major hurdles to doing rotary axis blending:
> >
> >1. Blends between circular motions (that also have
Great thanks for the pointers!
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:32 PM Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Hi Curtis,
>
> There are a few major hurdles to doing rotary axis blending:
>
>1. Blends between circular motions (that also have motion in other axes)
>are not geometrically possible with the
Hi Curtis,
There are a few major hurdles to doing rotary axis blending:
1. Blends between circular motions (that also have motion in other axes)
are not geometrically possible with the blending technique we use (circular
arc segments), except for some special cases. This IS possible
I don't mind doing the G93 calculations. The problem for me is no lookahead
when using x,y,z,a
Does anyone know why n-axis lookahead isn't easy to accomplish with the
new TP? (I'm sure its complicated ! :-)
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:47 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 14 March 2019
On Thursday 14 March 2019 09:12:51 Les Newell wrote:
> That does not help the trajectory planner lookahead problem. It just
> tries to correct the feed rates for each movement segment.
>
> Les
No, it doesn't, so in that sense you're correct, Les, but its certainly
one way to solve the problem
That does not help the trajectory planner lookahead problem. It just
tries to correct the feed rates for each movement segment.
Les
https://www.ganotechnologies.com/cnc/rapidrotary/
___
Emc-developers mailing list
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 12:45, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote:
> https://www.ganotechnologies.com/cnc/rapidrotary/
It might be possible to do this as an input filter too.
Here is an example that converts XY/UV foam-cutter G-code to inverse-time:
On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 13:50 -0400, Curtis Dutton wrote:
> I posted a while ago about adding software laser rastering to linuxcnc.
> I'm close to getting the documentation finished so I can get a pull request
> for that.
>
> I've recently begun to implement 4 axis simultaneous laser engraving
