Hi,
> Is 2.8 the same? I am wondering if this is related to
> https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/issues/865
I had the chance to take a snapshot of that accident =:O
When I tested about the omitted lines from backend, I run 3D_Chips.ngc from
axis with logging enabled. After having enuf logs c
Hi,
I got a bit further with investigations. I logged lines I got from backend (my
class StatusReader) and logged the processed lines of 3D preview:
StatusReader 07:54:48 backend executes line #21
Preview3DCreator 07:54:48 selected line changed from #1 to #21
StatusReader 07:54:
On Montag, 1. Juni 2020, 01:00:15 CEST andy pugh wrote:
> On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 17:58, Reinhard
>>
> > > Which LinuxCNC version?
> >
> > master from repository.
>
> Is 2.8 the same? I am wondering if this is related to
> https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/issues/865
Hm, wasn't aware of that
On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 17:58, Reinhard
wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> > Which LinuxCNC version?
>
> master from repository.
Is 2.8 the same? I am wondering if this is related to
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/issues/865
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is desig
Hi,
actually I'm working on my gremlin counterpart and basically I tested it with
the default ngc file from axis - where everything is fine.
I create the model from gcode-file and paint the preview with white color.
When processing starts, the current segment will be painted in red color. An
alr
Hi Andy,
> Which LinuxCNC version?
master from repository.
cheers Reinhard
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 17:12, Reinhard
wrote:
... but backend was stil executing motion and sending coordinate updates -
> for
> about one second or more.
Which LinuxCNC version?
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed
for the especial use of mechanical
Hi,
can someone please verify my understanding?
>From recent discussions I got that interpreter is doing all coordinate
calculations and that taskmanager does not change them.
So if that is true, than I would consider it a bug, that interpreter prints
different coordinate values from the same
