On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Pekka Roivainen wrote:
> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:55:03 +0300
> From: Pekka Roivainen
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-developers] Timing of realtime functions in uspace
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm building an ethernet based IO b
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 19:31:06 -0400
> From: Gene Heskett
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] Weirdest lcnc problem yet
>
> Greetings all;
>
> My GO704 box has decided it cannot find the RTLIB modules.
>
> I have
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of a
> conversational front-end. To me that sounds like an enumeration of the
> things LinuxCNC can do.
>
LiveCAM?
>
> --
> Sebastian Kuzminsky
>
> --
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Thomas Gambone II wrote:
> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 13:22:07 -0400
> From: Thomas Gambone II
> To: EMC developers
> Cc: Jeff Epler
> Subject: [Emc-developers] LinuxCNC on ARM + Mesa
>
> Hello all!
>
> First time mailing back to the list.
>
> Wanted to ask the list / Jeff Epl
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:40:02 +0200
> From: Nicholas Mc Guire
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] research on optical encoders
>
> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>
> I think the trick the Resolute encoder uses is this: the image is captured in
> a perhaps sub microsecond flash of the LED, and then the "image" can be
> shifted out of the sensor at a leisurely rate. The specifications sort of
> suggests this (very fast capture (ns) time, but only multi KHz ma
gt;> Am 08.08.2015 um 04:00 schrieb EBo:
>>> On Aug 7 2015 5:32 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, EBo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 17:13:25 -0600
>>>>> From: EBo
>>>>> Reply-To: EM
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, EBo wrote:
> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 17:13:25 -0600
> From: EBo
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] research on optical encoders
>
> On Aug 7 2015 4:16 PM, andy pugh wrote:
>> On 7 August 2015 at 12:23, EBo wr
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, Karlsson & Wang wrote:
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:12:43 +0200
> From: Karlsson & Wang
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-developers] Hostmot 2 ethernet (queue packets)
>
> Occasionally I got some communication errors which o
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:08:38 +
> From: Marius Liebenberg
> To: EMC developers ,
> emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Tormach PathPilot
>
>
>
>> On 07/16/2015 02:56 AM, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>>
>> ...
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 16:56:10 -0400
> From: Gene Heskett
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-developers] Next prob, zero docs on the BOB supplied
>
> Which is a db25-1205. Google found it ok, but its
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 01:18:37 +0100
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] New TP or Old TP bug? (or neither)
>
> http://www.linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/forum/38-general-linuxcnc-questions/29247-d
On Thu, 14 May 2015, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 13:47:08 +0100
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] hm2_eth
>
> Does hm2_eth support the 7i76E ? The manpage says not.
> Also, there is no mention of hm2_eth, or in fact anyt
On Tue, 5 May 2015, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 00:14:26 +0100
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Recent patches to hm2
>
> On 30 April 2015 at 02:53, Jeff Epler wrote:
>> you'd add hm2_resolver_queue_read which looks
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:00:18 +0100
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Recent patches to hm2
>
> On 29 April 2015 at 16:52, Jeff Epler wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, these new requirements rea
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015, Andrew wrote:
> Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 21:40:27 +0200
> From: Andrew
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] New TP bugs?
>
> Hello,
>
> Today I ran into a comparison of hobby CNC software on a russian forum. The
> guy made a test traject
On Sat, 6 Dec 2014, David Armstrong wrote:
> Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:57:21 +
> From: David Armstrong
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] 7i77 and stepper output
>
> more for PCW i'd expect :
>
> is it possible to get a stepgen output from a 5i25/7i7
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, John Prentice (FS) wrote:
> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:21:06 -
> From: "John Prentice (FS)"
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] Debugging my 7180/7i39 combination
>
> Greetings (probably for PCW)
>
>
>
> Background: Running 2.8.0P
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Chris Morley wrote:
> Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 18:23:41 +
> From: Chris Morley
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC DEV
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Pncconf in master
>
>
>
> Thanks Peter it really helps.
> A few questions:
>
>>
>>
>> A couple things:
>>
>> loadrt probe
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Chris Morley wrote:
> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 05:11:59 +
> From: Chris Morley
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC DEV
> Subject: [Emc-developers] Pncconf in master
>
> I have pushed a new refactored version of pncconf into master.
> This one makes PID stepper configs.
>
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, David Armstrong wrote:
> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:09:53 +0100
> From: David Armstrong
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] analog spindle scaling with 7i77
>
> Guy's
> i'm having a problem trying to get a analog 10v spinde to scale c
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 22:51:40 -0600
> From: Sebastian Kuzminsky
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" ,
> EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] LinuxCNC 2.6.0 is out!
>
> Howdy folks, at long last LinuxCNC 2.6.0 is here.
>
> Here
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Jeff Epler wrote:
> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:54:33 -0500
> From: Jeff Epler
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] "jepler/rtos-uspace": a new POSIX realtime
> branch
>
> Positive feedback is always welcome. Has anyone tried t
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 12:58:28 -0400
> From: Gene Heskett
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-developers] 5i25/7i78 question
>
> Greetings;
>
> I am considering, because of the quantization noise in the
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Micha? Geszkiewicz wrote:
> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:47:38 +0200
> From: "[UTF-8] Micha? Geszkiewicz"
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Ethernet / Mesa status.
>
> W dniu 19.06.2014 12:10, andy pugh pisze:
>> Am I right in thi
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, ELHIMA Moustapha wrote:
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 01:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: ELHIMA Moustapha
To: "emc-us...@lists.sourceforge.net" ,
emc2
Subject: [Emc-users] Step motor in closed loop
Dear All,
I'm back to get some help, I've tried to use my 2 phases 1.8° 12Nm stepmot
On Fri, 30 May 2014, bruno wrote:
> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 17:29:28 +0200
> From: bruno
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-developers] bug with nurbs ?
>
> Hello,
>
> I wrote a quadrangle pocketing routine in G-Code which uses nurbs
> (G5.2). T
On Fri, 30 May 2014, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:46:48 +0100
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] RFC: Support for multiple tool offsets (aka wear
> offsets)
>
> On 30 May 2014 14:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>> P
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, John Kasunich wrote:
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:56:06 -0400
> From: John Kasunich
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Unit conversions in Canon
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014, at 11:10 AM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, dave wrote:
> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 08:28:22 -0700
> From: dave
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Another query on numerical formats
>
> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 12:02 +0100, andy pugh wrote:
>> This thread raised an interesting question
>> http://linuxcnc.o
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:38:38 -0600
> From: Sebastian Kuzminsky
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Question on 14.04 LTS
>
> On 3/25/14 12:28 , Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Is there any progress on build
On Sun, 16 Mar 2014, Michael Haberler wrote:
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 23:16:59 +0100
From: Michael Haberler
Reply-To: EMC developers
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] PID bidirectional pins.
Am 16.03.2014 um 23:02 schrieb John Kasunich :
I think the only legitimate use case fo
On Sun, 16 Mar 2014, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:52:25 +
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] PID bidirectional pins.
>
> On 16 March 2014 13:36, Michael Haberler wrote:
>
>> well in that case a HAL widget like
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:53:59 -0500
> From: Gene Heskett
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] gentoo distro
>
> On Friday 28 February 2014 15:02:37 Peter C. Walla
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Jon Elson wrote:
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 11:03:38 -0600
> From: Jon Elson
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] gentoo distro
>
> On 02/28/2014 06:24 AM, andy pugh wrote:
>> On 27 February 2014 15:22, bari 0 wrote:
>>> He's m
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:40:19 +0100
> From: Michael Haberler
> To: Peter C. Wallace ,
> EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] reports on rt-preempt / latency-test: max jitter
> going down
>
>
> Am
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 09:59:52 +0100
> From: Michael Haberler
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] reports on rt-preempt / latency-test: max jitter
> going down
>
> could the folks observing this behaviour please run the follo
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Jon Elson wrote:
> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 20:58:30 -0600
> From: Jon Elson
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] configs/ structure
>
> On 01/16/2014 01:03 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>> By way of example, the various mesa conf
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Marius Alksnys wrote:
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:55:37 +0200
> From: Marius Alksnys
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-developers] THC functionality
>
> Features I lack in thc component:
>
> 1. height reset
>I am not u
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:22:24 -0500
> From: Robert Ellenberg
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Initial tests of circular arc blending
>
>>
>> Its good to remember that both step/dir systems and most se
On Sun, 1 Dec 2013, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 17:30:02 -0500
> From: Robert Ellenberg
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Initial tests of circular arc blending
>
> Good find! After running that program, I'm seeing similar spike
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, Dewey Garrett wrote:
> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:08:11 + (UTC)
> From: Dewey Garrett
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Question re newer kernel
>
>
> # 131124:10.05
> I successfully tested these kernel
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013, Marius Alksnys wrote:
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:04:50 +0200
> From: Marius Alksnys
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] BLDC component homing to encoder index - is it
> correct?
>
> On 11/15/2013 02:05 A
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Marius Alksnys wrote:
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 18:53:03 +0200
> From: Marius Alksnys
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-developers] BLDC component homing to encoder index - is it
> correct?
>
> I kind of noticed that BL
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
I managed to pick up a IBA (the RS-422 --> Interface Bus Adapter: 3-531-4370A)
cheap on EBAY and will at least take a look at it
Peter Wallace
Mesa Electronics
--
Get
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 14:58:17 -0600
> From: Sebastian Kuzminsky
> To: EMC developers
> Cc: Peter C. Wallace
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] 7i80 support
>
> On 08/18/2013 02:52 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>> On
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 17:24:03 +0100
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] 7i80 support
>
> On 18 August 2013 07:32, Michael Haberler wrote:
>>
>> the branch is here:
>> https://github.com/mh
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:48:52 -0500
> From: Stuart Stevenson
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC2-Users-List ,
> Emc2-developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] cinci control
>
> Gentlemen,
> These pictures are from a Cincinnati 950 control. T
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Jon Elson wrote:
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 21:47:32 -0500
> From: Jon Elson
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] architecture-specific drivers
>
> Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>> I think a good way to
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Jon Elson wrote:
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:23:04 -0500
> From: Jon Elson
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] architecture-specific drivers
>
> I have a BeagleBone on order, and am thinking about the
> issues of converting "my" PPMC
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 20:43:53 +0100
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] "Open" Development
>
> On 6 July 2013 20:32, Chris Morley wrote:
>
>> infinite jerk is impossible for a machine to prod
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 07:14:41 -0500
> From: Stuart Stevenson
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: EMC2-Users-List ,
> Emc2-developers
> Subject: [Emc-users] Okuma absolute encoders
>
> Will the Okuma absolute encoders al
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:10:01 -0500
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] 7I39HV question
>
> On 18 June 2013 12:06, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>
>> Sure I'
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:56:31 -0500
> From: Charles Steinkuehler
> To: EMC developers
> Cc: Peter C. Wallace
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] 7I39HV question
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
&
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, John Kasunich wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:35:52 -0400
> From: John Kasunich
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] 7I39HV question
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013, at 12:19
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, John Kasunich wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:20:57 -0400
> From: John Kasunich
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] 7I39HV question
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013, at 10:02 AM, andy pugh wrote:
>> On 18 June
On Sat, 18 May 2013, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 09:20:03 -0400
> From: Kent A. Reed
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] on the subject of governance
>
> A modest suggestion:
>
> There are lots of governance models out there. Rather than
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013, Matt Shaver wrote:
> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 19:01:50 -0400
> From: Matt Shaver
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2 over spi
>
> On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:29:10 -0500
> Jon Elson wrote:
>
>> I think the
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Jon Elson wrote:
> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:57:04 -0600
> From: Jon Elson
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2-firmware build problem
>
> Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>>
>>
>> It should
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Matt Shaver wrote:
> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:50:47 -0500
> From: Matt Shaver
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2-firmware build problem
>
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:07:06 -
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Matt Shaver wrote:
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:41:59 -0500
> From: Matt Shaver
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2-firmware build problem
>
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:10:00 -0700
> Sebastian Kuzminsky
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Matt Shaver wrote:
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:16:13 -0500
> From: Matt Shaver
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Motherboard Suggestions Needed
>
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:11:10 +0400
> Alexey Starikovskiy
> I see quite a few potential users for such a HAL/RTAPI package; of course it
> isnt impossible right now, as you say, but the fact that it is integrated
> with linuxcnc brings not only baggage with it. I would think few people
> outside the Linuxcnc community are actually aware of separate HAL
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, John Kasunich wrote:
> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:08:37 -0500
> From: John Kasunich
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM configuration questions
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013, at 03:59 PM, EBo wrote:
>
>>
>> possibly, but a
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Anders Wallin wrote:
> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:01:15 +0200
> From: Anders Wallin
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] SPI, Smart Serial,
> or other interface for ADC/DAC <-> mesa-card?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am considering building v
results from Chris Radeks PID mod:
Both same tuning torque mode PID loop with enough integral term to track
velocity
(850 IPM slew)
error-previous-target false:
freeby.mesanet.com/ept-false.png
error-previous-target true:
freeby.mesanet.com/ept-true.png
Haven't checked whether index thump e
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013, John Kasunich wrote:
> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:44:25 -0500
> From: John Kasunich
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] proposed patch for v2.5_branch: correct ferror
> calculation
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 12,
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013, Andy Pugh wrote:
> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:12:03 +0100
> From: Andy Pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] proposed patch for v2.5_branch: correct ferror
> calculation
>
>
>
> On 13 Jan 2013, at 11:57, Michael Haberler w
I should note that error in ferror is -velocity*sampleperiod (not
-velocity/sampleperiod)
Also this error is not specific to torque mode drives, its just more easily
hidden with velocity mode drives (with FF1).
It will always show up if sufficient integral term is used that the PID error
gets
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Chris Radek wrote:
> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:54:33 -0600
> From: Chris Radek
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] proposed patch for v2.5_branch: correct ferror
> calculation
>
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:13:05AM +0100, Micha
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:51:20 +0100
> From: Michael Haberler
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] PCI drivers: roundup of leftovers - take 2
>
> let me restate the question:
>
> who is interested in support
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 01:48:34 +0100
> From: Michael Haberler
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] PCI drivers: roundup of leftovers: hal_gn,
> hal_motenc, hal_vti, opto_ac5, pci_8255
>
>
> Am 28.12.
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012, Anders Wallin wrote:
> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:00:13 +0200
> From: Anders Wallin
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] trying out Mesanet PCI cards with userland
> thread builds
>
>>
>> Is this normal LinuxCNC or the Xenomai/
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012, Anders Wallin wrote:
> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:09:02 +0200
> From: Anders Wallin
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] trying out Mesanet PCI cards with userland
> thread builds
>
with the hostmot2-firmware-3x20-1 deb pa
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:57:17 -0800 (PST)
> From: Peter C. Wallace
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] trying out Mesanet PCI cards with userland
> thread builds
>
> On
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Anders Wallin wrote:
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:17:09 +0200
> From: Anders Wallin
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] trying out Mesanet PCI cards with userland
> thread builds
>
> with the hostmot2-firmware-3x20-1 deb packa
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Andreas Strecker wrote:
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:00:23 +0100
> From: Andreas Strecker
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Emc-developers Digest, Vol 80,
> Issue 27 : Speed Measurement with digital encod
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 20:01:52 -0600
> From: Charles Steinkuehler
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] xenomai + linuxcnc on 12.04LTS
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/2/20
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, vroemm wrote:
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:01:42 +0100
> From: vroemm
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-developers] Compile error: stdio.h not found from homing.c
>
>
> O Wise Ones...
>
> I have a compile mystery with linux
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:03:11 -0500
> From: Kent A. Reed
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Preview: LinuxCNC 2.5 single codebase - supports
> RTAI, RT_PREEMPT, Xenomai-kernel, Xenomai-User, Simulator
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:07:45 -0400
> From: Gene Heskett
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] ferror calculation incorrect in motion
>
> On Friday 02 November 2012 11:44:04 Jon Elson did
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:25:31 -0500
> From: Stuart Stevenson
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] ferror calculation incorrect in motion
>
> Gentlemen,
> What is ferror used for in m
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 17:00:33 +
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] ferror calculation incorrect in motion
>
> On 1 November 2012 16:52, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
&
is
basically impossible to tune out)
>
> On 11/1/2012 9:09 AM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, EBo wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:47:30 -0400
>>> From: EBo
>>> Reply-To: EMC developers
>>> To: emc-developers@list
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, EBo wrote:
> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:47:30 -0400
> From: EBo
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] ferror calculation incorrect in motion
>
> This is exactly why I asked for references so we could look at the
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:23:09 +
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] ferror calculation incorrect in motion
>
> On 1 November 2012 06:51, EBo wrote:
>
>>
>> OK Now the question is should t
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, EBo wrote:
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:56:28 -0500
> From: EBo
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] ferror calculation incorrect in motion
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:28:30 -0700 (PDT), P
1, 2012, at 10:28 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>>
>> After spending some forum time trying to help a customer with tuning a
>> torque
>> mode drive, I have noticed that ferror is calculated incorrectly and if
>> minimized will result in less than optimum actual error
After spending some forum time trying to help a customer with tuning a torque
mode drive, I have noticed that ferror is calculated incorrectly and if
minimized will result in less than optimum actual error.
The error appears to be that ferror is calculated before the trajectory is
calculated s
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:40:04 -0400
> From: Gene Heskett
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] AVR Chips, RepRap, and LinuxCNC
>
> On Wednesday 29 August 2012 19:36:52 EBo did opine:
>
>
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:21:46 +0100
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] future plannig was: LinuxCNC (EMC2) with RCS
>
> On 12 August 2012 15:32, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
>
>> The difference i
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Andrew wrote:
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:56:36 +0300
> From: Andrew
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Latency and latency
>
> 2012/8/9 Peter C. Wallace
>
>>>> It gets
>>>> notic
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Andrew wrote:
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 21:45:23 +0300
> From: Andrew
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Latency and latency
>
> 2012/8/9 Peter C. Wallace
>
>> It gets
>> noticable worse w
> I'm back again.
>
> Maybe the cart is creeping ahead of the horse. ... just visualize that!
> Re' the post by Peter about MW525's being limited to 1.25 KHz cycle rate
> and this seems to be a trend in intel processors being less and less
> suited to rt maybe it is time to find a new architecture
While testing our maximum SSerial update rates, (linuxCNC 2.5.1 Ubuntu 10.4) I
noticed something somewhat interesting/disturbing about latency test on the
servo thread on my Atom 330 based motherboard (Jetway). After disabling
hyperthreading in the BIOS and adding the isolcpus=1 line to grub.cf
On Thu, 31 May 2012, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:10:39 +0100
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] CSMIO Eth motion controller + EMC2
>
> On 31 May 2012 17:47, Michael Haberler wrote:
>
>> any idea what the Mesa folk
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:42:05 -0500
From: Charles Steinkuehler
Reply-To: EMC developers
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] The preempt_RT vs RTAI question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/30/2012 2:28 PM, Vi
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:46:48 -0500
> From: Charles Steinkuehler
> To: EMC developers
> Cc: Peter C. Wallace
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] The preempt_RT vs RTAI question
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:13:27 -0400
> From: Kent A. Reed
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] The preempt_RT vs RTAI question
>
> Gentle persons:
>
> The question of alternatives to the RTAI approach seems to r
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Jon Elson wrote:
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:41:34 -0500
> From: Jon Elson
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] [!! SPAM] Re: I am new here
>
> Kirk Wallace wrote:
>> For instance resolvers were not supported until some of
>> the
101 - 200 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
