On 1/30/14 14:25 , David Bagby wrote:
> Hi Seb,
> I'd started to made a patch per yesterday's email thread. When I got up
> this morning (I'm on Pacific time) I saw this thread and that Charles
> had already done part of the change. Since the end result is the same,
> I did not go back and apply h
Hi Seb,
I'd started to made a patch per yesterday's email thread. When I got up
this morning (I'm on Pacific time) I saw this thread and that Charles
had already done part of the change. Since the end result is the same,
I did not go back and apply his patch first and then re-create this patc
On 1/30/14 07:56 , Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> It appears I was overzealous when adding license boilerplate and
> copyright notices on some of the new ARM configuration files.
>
> Attached is a patch that correctly attributes copyright for files in the
> K9 directory and removes the GPLV2+ licens
It appears I was overzealous when adding license boilerplate and
copyright notices on some of the new ARM configuration files.
Attached is a patch that correctly attributes copyright for files in the
K9 directory and removes the GPLV2+ license boilerplate I added.
I leave it to Calypso Ventures /
