> Mick > > I hope you don't mind I pushed this back to the list. > > I too was hoping to make inroads for modularity, future proofing, and > lowering the bar for future developers. Instead of NML there might be some kind of standard protocol to use to talk with machine running real time part? Or machine running g-code?
> I'm not an expert of course but the multi core approach did seem to make > sense for the future. To run real time parts on simple micro controller and GUI on ordinary computer make a lot of sense. > It was also conveniently already done and already modular. It is modular with NML communication in between. > I do appreciate, everyone's participation in the discussion. > > I feel it's good to stop and ask these kinds of questions from time to time. > > Chris M I am still working on hardware but are pretty sure I nailed which physical buses I should use and suitable protocol. Then this is done I will continue with Linuxcnc, I have one or two drivers partly added. _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
