Am 01.10.22 um 18:01 schrieb andy pugh:
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 16:29, Hans Unzner wrote:
Unfortunately this would not work because:
- From the pin name you can't draw a conclusion on the function.
For example "mb2hal.00.01" could be fnct_06_write_single_register or
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 16:29, Hans Unzner wrote:
> Unfortunately this would not work because:
> - From the pin name you can't draw a conclusion on the function.
>For example "mb2hal.00.01" could be fnct_06_write_single_register or
> fnct_02_read_discrete_inputs. So should be either converted
Am 25.09.22 um 19:59 schrieb andy pugh:
On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 10:57, Hans Unzner wrote:
On principle a good idea but I think it's misleading if the INI version
number is increased when only something inside a component has changed.
Maybe, but it actually serves no other purpose (and was
On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 20:26, Hans Unzner wrote:
> > I think that using it to handle pin name changes in a component is
> > entirely consistent with its current use.
> >
> Okay that will be much easier than to introduce a version number in
> MB2HAL. I'll give it a try. Thanks
Am 25.09.22 um 19:59 schrieb andy pugh:
On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 10:57, Hans Unzner wrote:
On principle a good idea but I think it's misleading if the INI version
number is increased when only something inside a component has changed.
Maybe, but it actually serves no other purpose (and was
On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 10:57, Hans Unzner wrote:
> On principle a good idea but I think it's misleading if the INI version
> number is increased when only something inside a component has changed.
Maybe, but it actually serves no other purpose (and was simply ignored
for about 20 years until I
Am 24.09.22 um 16:31 schrieb andy pugh:
On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 08:46, Hans Unzner wrote:
But I have another question: Some time ago I extended MB2HAL and also
changed some of the existing pin names to match the structure.
So one have to change some pin names when switching to 2.9. I
On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 08:46, Hans Unzner wrote:
> But I have another question: Some time ago I extended MB2HAL and also
> changed some of the existing pin names to match the structure.
> So one have to change some pin names when switching to 2.9. I already
> read some posts about trouble with
On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 01:53, Chris Morley wrote:
>
> Hey Andy, it may be helpful to new devs if you could go over the rough
> process of release candidate to officially release.
I was hoping that Seb would pop up and say if this was actually the next step.
All that I have to go in is:
Am 20.09.22 um 22:59 schrieb andy pugh:
Is it time to split 2.9 off as a stable-ish branch with a 2.9.0~pre0 tag?
I agree.
Still at least two things to fix related to Gmoccapy, but can be
finished in a 2.9 branch as well.
But I have another question: Some time ago I extended MB2HAL and
Hey Andy, it may be helpful to new devs if you could go over the rough process
of release candidate to officially release.
Chris
From: andy pugh
Sent: September 21, 2022 3:45 PM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Time to split 2.9 and master
> On 23 Sep 2022, at 9:39 am, Rod Webster wrote:
>
> I think integrators and users don't want to be continually installing new
> versions of Plasmac et al.
> Plasmac has only ever existed in the development branch. First a private
> fork, then 2.8, then 2.9
> There are updates to it on an
I think integrators and users don't want to be continually installing new
versions of Plasmac et al.
Plasmac has only ever existed in the development branch. First a private
fork, then 2.8, then 2.9
There are updates to it on an almost daily basis. Most of them seem to be
small tweaks that often
Le mar. 20 sept. 2022 à 23:04, andy pugh a écrit :
> Is it time to split 2.9 off as a stable-ish branch with a 2.9.0~pre0 tag?
Would gladly hear the opinion of the "docs team" chaps about this :)
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Le mer. 21 sept. 2022 à 04:24, Phill Carter a
écrit :
>
> > On 21 Sep 2022, at 6:59 am, andy pugh wrote:
>
> I have some plasmac work that I would like to push before that happens.
It should be completed by the end of this month.
As said in an earlier message, I believe [Qt]PlasmaC as well as
To clarify, I wasn't implying it meant anything different. The SIGFPE problem
is fixed anyway so disregard my previous email.
Alec
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 10:47:34 AM CDT, andy pugh
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 15:05, Chris Morley
wrote:
> I think we should make the
On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 15:05, Chris Morley
wrote:
> I think we should make the branch now. Making the branch does not preclude
> doing finishing work in the branch.
Indeed, it just makes "master" back into more of a testing playground.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium
Ari
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Time to split 2.9 and master?
Ah, it's already fixed:
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/commit/9471c059d133f7d14363f6a7cdcf87a4de4666e6
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 03:55:44 AM UTC, Alec Ari via
Emc-developers wrote:
I think fixing the SIGFPE
Ah, it's already fixed:
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/commit/9471c059d133f7d14363f6a7cdcf87a4de4666e6
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 03:55:44 AM UTC, Alec Ari via
Emc-developers wrote:
I think fixing the SIGFPE (signal 8 error, floating point exception) should be
fixed as
I think fixing the SIGFPE (signal 8 error, floating point exception) should be
fixed as well prior to the branch point.
Can RTAI be a milestone before the final 2.9 release btw?
Thanks,
Alec
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 02:21:16 AM UTC, Phill Carter
wrote:
> On 21 Sep
> On 21 Sep 2022, at 6:59 am, andy pugh wrote:
>
> Is it time to split 2.9 off as a stable-ish branch with a 2.9.0~pre0 tag?
I have some plasmac work that I would like to push before that happens. It
should be completed by the end of this month.
I also have a question regarding packaging.
Time for a official 2.9 stanle... :o I second! :)
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022, 6:43 PM Rod Webster wrote:
> Yes please!
>
> Rod Webster
> *1300 896 832*
> +61 435 765 611
> Vehicle Modifications Network
> www.vehiclemods.net.au
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 07:00, andy pugh wrote:
>
> > Is it time
Yes please!
Rod Webster
*1300 896 832*
+61 435 765 611
Vehicle Modifications Network
www.vehiclemods.net.au
On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 07:00, andy pugh wrote:
> Is it time to split 2.9 off as a stable-ish branch with a 2.9.0~pre0 tag?
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium
Is it time to split 2.9 off as a stable-ish branch with a 2.9.0~pre0 tag?
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed
for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
24 matches
Mail list logo
