Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-11-09 Thread Kenneth Lerman
Right now, you get an error together with a line number. A good fix would be to do a stack backtrace. If it is in a subroutine, show the line that it was called from including the values of all of the arguments. Then, if that line is in a subroutine, show where it was called from with its

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-11-09 Thread EBo
Agreed on all accounts. It is also possible that options 1 and/or 2 could be structure in such a way to support option 3 (simula gdb). I was serious about the intern thing. If one was interested I would be glad to try to help with mentioning, but I have roughly a petabyte of data to process

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-11-06 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 06 November 2015 09:09:26 EBo wrote: > On Nov 6 2015 6:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Friday 06 November 2015 04:53:15 andy pugh wrote: > >> On 6 November 2015 at 04:29, Fernand Veilleux > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > gcode is terrible IMHO. > >> > >> It's a

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-11-06 Thread EBo
On Nov 6 2015 4:44 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 06 November 2015 09:09:26 EBo wrote: > >> On Nov 6 2015 6:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> > On Friday 06 November 2015 04:53:15 andy pugh wrote: >> >> On 6 November 2015 at 04:29, Fernand Veilleux >> >> >> > >> > wrote:

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-11-06 Thread andy pugh
On 6 November 2015 at 04:29, Fernand Veilleux wrote: > gcode is terrible IMHO. It's a terrible programming language, but then it was never intended to be one. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-11-06 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 06 November 2015 04:53:15 andy pugh wrote: > On 6 November 2015 at 04:29, Fernand Veilleux wrote: > > gcode is terrible IMHO. > > It's a terrible programming language, but then it was never intended > to be one. I wouldn't condem it quite that vociferously.

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-11-06 Thread EBo
On Nov 6 2015 6:19 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 6 November 2015 at 12:57, EBo wrote: >>> It's a terrible programming language, but then it was never >>> intended >>> to be one. >> >> fine, but what is better? STEP-NC (ISO-10303/14649)? > > It is a machine control language, not a

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-11-06 Thread andy pugh
On 6 November 2015 at 12:57, EBo wrote: >> It's a terrible programming language, but then it was never intended >> to be one. > > fine, but what is better? STEP-NC (ISO-10303/14649)? It is a machine control language, not a programming language. If you want a programming

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-11-06 Thread Dewey Garrett
> ... > It seems that you deleted bringing_features > ... The 'bringin_features' branch rebased on git master was deleted to avoid confustion with a newer branch 'features_preview' based on git 2.7 (the current release) > ... > But you should not work with version 2.0 it is outdated, having

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-11-06 Thread EBo
On Nov 6 2015 2:53 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 6 November 2015 at 04:29, Fernand Veilleux > wrote: >> gcode is terrible IMHO. > > It's a terrible programming language, but then it was never intended > to be one. fine, but what is better? STEP-NC (ISO-10303/14649)?

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-11-06 Thread EBo
On Nov 6 2015 6:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 06 November 2015 04:53:15 andy pugh wrote: > >> On 6 November 2015 at 04:29, Fernand Veilleux >> > wrote: >> > gcode is terrible IMHO. >> >> It's a terrible programming language, but then it was never intended >> to

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-11-05 Thread Fernand Veilleux
Le 2015-10-26 13:09, Sebastian Kuzminsky a écrit : > Hello Nick and Fernand, I'm a developer on the LinuxCNC project and > we've been talking about getting linuxcnc-features into the next > stable release of linuxcnc. > > Is this something you'd be interested in, willing to help with? > > We

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-features in linuxcnc?

2015-10-29 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
(Please CC the emc-developers list in any replies you send.) On 10/28/2015 02:27 AM, Nick wrote: > Hello Sebastian. > > You should consider Fern's > repo http://fernv.github.io/linuxcnc-features/ as it is latest one. > > We are interested in including Features into linuxcnc repo because it >