On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 at 15:51, Steffen Möller via Emc-developers
wrote:
> Is there any way for us to have runtime tests for any such limits?
> Simulation, I presume. But how far away are we?
When you say "runtime tests" what do you mean?
I added a PR for a regression test:
https://github.com/Li
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 at 15:51, Steffen Möller via Emc-developers
wrote:
> Is there any way for us to have runtime tests for any such limits?
> Simulation, I presume. But how far away are we?
The caps are applied to the HAL pins, so it should be trivial to test.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle
An: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Emc-developers] Spindle Docs 2.9
>
> I went back to 2.9.0~pre that is in Debian 12 and reverse works but
> forward does not cap the speeds. I would suggest changing the wording in
> the docs in updating linuxcnc from 2.8x to 2.9.y
I went back to 2.9.0~pre that is in Debian 12 and reverse works but
forward does not cap the speeds. I would suggest changing the wording in
the docs in updating linuxcnc from 2.8x to 2.9.y to 2.8 to 2.9.1 and
later to be more specific that it only works with 2.9.1 or later. This
may be where I
Now I'm really confused as to why it didn't cap the values because it
works this morning for all 4 ini items on Axis 2.9.1.
Sorry for the static.
JT
On 7/21/25 18:11, andy pugh wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 at 14:23, John Thornton wrote:
Is this only in master and the docs are wrong or is thi
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 at 14:23, John Thornton wrote:
> Is this only in master and the docs are wrong or is this just broken?
Probably just broken.
The INI settings do get read:
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/2.9/src/emc/ini/inispindle.cc#L65
And fed into the spindle settings:
https://