On 12/28/15 3:58 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 27 December 2015 at 19:59, Mattias wrote:
>
>> Did you sort this issue out?
>> I get the same error when trying to make my own toolchanging macros.
>> I have tried in 2.7-pre6 and 2.7.3
>
> I think that this is the fix:
> http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=
On 27 December 2015 at 19:59, Mattias wrote:
> Did you sort this issue out?
> I get the same error when trying to make my own toolchanging macros.
> I have tried in 2.7-pre6 and 2.7.3
I think that this is the fix:
http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commit;h=301cc84f8727cba3cca3323e0
andy pugh writes:
>
> On 6 August 2015 at 01:36, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> > Your error message is:
> > 9:duplicate O-word label - already defined in line 29: 'O200
> > IF[#
> > GT 0]'
> > This is saying that on line 9 of the current file there is a definition
of
> > O200 and that this has previ
On 6 August 2015 at 01:36, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> Your error message is:
> 9:duplicate O-word label - already defined in line 29: 'O200
> IF[#
> GT 0]'
> This is saying that on line 9 of the current file there is a definition of
> O200 and that this has previously been defined on line 29.
> Line
Looking at the code, I see (rs274ngc/interp_o_word.cc: 862) appears to be
where the message is generated.
Your error message is:
9:duplicate O-word label - already defined in line 29: 'O200
IF[#
GT 0]'
This is saying that on line 9 of the current file there is a definition of
O200 and that this ha
On 5 August 2015 at 18:07, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> I've seen a similar thing happen when I call a subroutine using MDI. First
> I call it. That's not a problem. I call it again. That's not a problem. I
> see that it isn't working properly for some reason and I edit the file --
> adding or removing
Hi Andy,
I haven't looked at that code since I wrote the original and I assume that
it has been modified if not completely replaced. I can probably add some
insight to what is supposed to be happening.
1 -- There are two phases to interpretation of o sub lines. In the
first phase, the sub is bein
On 5 August 2015 at 15:41, EBo wrote:
> What whitespace problem?
A speculative one that might not exist. It was a guess.
The first time through the G-code routine
860 if (control_find_oword(block, settings, &op) == INTERP_OK) {
returns false for both "if" statements.
The second time thro
On Aug 5 2015 3:16 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 5 August 2015 at 07:41, EBo wrote:
>>> hazy now, and found that it went away if I quit using a capital O,
>>> so
>>> I've been using o100 style o-words ever since. So you might want
>>> to
>>> include that in your pattern tests.
>>
>> That would be a
On 5 August 2015 at 07:41, EBo wrote:
>> hazy now, and found that it went away if I quit using a capital O, so
>> I've been using o100 style o-words ever since. So you might want to
>> include that in your pattern tests.
>
> That would be a good bug to to fix IMNSHO.
I don't think that it is act
On Aug 4 2015 8:15 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2015 20:51:18 andy pugh wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> I have not yet figured out what it is about the O100 if that
>> triggers
>> a problem in the next IF. (The error actually occurs during
>> interpretation of the second IF)
>> I have trie
On Tuesday 04 August 2015 20:51:18 andy pugh wrote:
> On 25 July 2015 at 12:35, andy pugh wrote:
> > As reported in
> > http://psha.org.ru/irc/%23emc/2015-07-22.html#16:59:29
> >
> > The G-code re-map in the carousel_demo branch gives the error:
> > 9:duplicate O-word label - already defined in l
On 25 July 2015 at 12:35, andy pugh wrote:
> As reported in
> http://psha.org.ru/irc/%23emc/2015-07-22.html#16:59:29
>
> The G-code re-map in the carousel_demo branch gives the error:
> 9:duplicate O-word label - already defined in line 29: 'O200 IF
> [# GT 0]'
I have done some experimenting and
On 25 July 2015 at 13:35, andy pugh wrote:
> This sounds like something that Tormach have already found and fixed.
> (spotted in a release note).
Apparently Tormach have found it, but not fixed it.
So a resolution still needs to be found, it seems.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
14 matches
Mail list logo
