On Jan 26 2014 8:22 PM, Jeff Epler wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 09:07:56PM +0100, Michael Haberler wrote:
I have a fix which works for me:
https://github.com/mhaberler/linuxcnc/commit/10924b5509a2d2e38533a9f9e876d139a2cf5d4b
(branch unified-build-candidate-3)
Good catch. That it may
A simplified example (using no subroutines)
shows the type of failure that bruno reported.
g42.1 is used so no specific tool is needed to show the fault.
The failing test is in interp_convert.cc:
CHKS((fabs(cos(A_ang)) TOLERANCE_EQUAL),
NCE_TOOL_RADIUS_NOT_LESS_THAN_ARC_RADIUS_WITH_COMP);
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:04:06AM -0700, EBo wrote:
Hmmm... it might be a good idea to write a filter and search for large
constants and review them not only for simplifying, but also for
appropriate size.
It's worth noting that gcc 4.7 compiles both of these to the same code
when -O or
On 27 January 2014 15:42, Dewey Garrett dgarr...@panix.com wrote:
CHKS((fabs(cos(A_ang)) TOLERANCE_EQUAL),
NCE_TOOL_RADIUS_NOT_LESS_THAN_ARC_RADIUS_WITH_COMP);
with TOLERANCE_EQUAL == .0001 in interp_internal.hh
My initial thought is that it isn't necessary to use a tolerance for a
less
Thanks for pushing that fix. But Michael (and everyone), please stop
adding new features to ubc. I'm thinking specifically of Jeff's
lineardeltakins that were included in the threads.0 bugfix push.
Let's all focus on getting that branch mergable, without adding more
stuff to it.
On
On Jan 27 2014 9:18 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On 27 January 2014 15:42, Dewey Garrett dgarr...@panix.com wrote:
CHKS((fabs(cos(A_ang)) TOLERANCE_EQUAL),
NCE_TOOL_RADIUS_NOT_LESS_THAN_ARC_RADIUS_WITH_COMP);
with TOLERANCE_EQUAL == .0001 in interp_internal.hh
My initial thought is that it isn't
Glad you can reproduce the error !
Obviously it is important to fix linuxcnc, but do you think the gcode
generated by qpocket is also a little too close to an edge case
(programatically and also geometrically :-) )
I mean in the example I gave, if you disable path compensation, the
entry
To those with linuxcnc web site control:
http://linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/forum/32-documents/27447-source-code-access
he surely has some good points.
Chris M
--
Dennis
Thanks for stopping by,
sorry I was grumpy, no good excuse.
Please dont worry about the house
maybe drive by and see if its still there :)
I'm in Ky now, Mon night
got one up and running
but I'm not happy
its too sensitive to flush pressure
other one is running too
its problem is, IF it
