Thanks Chris,
I shall begin squashing…
Cheers, Phill.
> On 28 Jun 2019, at 12:06 pm, Chris Morley wrote:
>
> In general if there commits that are not so note worthy such as 'WIP' you
> probably should squash them.
> In my case I squashed almost everything with qtvcp unless I thought it was
This is good news - thank you Memfob and Andy.
Chris M
From: andy pugh
Sent: June 27, 2019 11:20 PM
To: EMC developers
Subject: [Emc-developers] Good news on RTAI
https://github.com/NTULINUX/RTAI/tree/for-next
Many thanks to Memfrob / Neo / Alex whatever name
In general if there commits that are not so note worthy such as 'WIP' you
probably should squash them.
In my case I squashed almost everything with qtvcp unless I thought it was
really important, before I initially added it to master.
So I would suggest be ruthless with squashing before putting
I am ready to push plasmac but before I do should I try to squash it to one
commit.
There are 440+ local commits and sometime I was a bit lazy with commit comments.
Cheers, Phill.
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Thanks Andy, it seemed to have worked…
Cheers, Phill.
> On 28 Jun 2019, at 9:28 am, andy pugh wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 23:40, Phillip Carter wrote:
>
>> The linuxcnc repo is my upstream repo, so do I just do git push this_branch
>> upstream:master
>
> What I do:
>
> git push
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 23:40, Phillip Carter wrote:
> The linuxcnc repo is my upstream repo, so do I just do git push this_branch
> upstream:master
What I do:
git push --dry-run
(some output that generally includes abcd1234...3456dcf12)
git log -p abcd1234...3456dcf12
(do I see what I
https://github.com/NTULINUX/RTAI/tree/for-next
Many thanks to Memfrob / Neo / Alex whatever name he is using now :-)
Using this repository I have built an RTAI kernel on 4.14 which works
(on a machine that has never worked with RTAI since the Wheezy ISO)
andypugh@rm-one:~/linuxcnc-dev/src$
Thank you,
Both gmoccapy.txt and gmoccapy-hu.txt have the same chapter anchor name and a
grep of docs/src seems to show no documents requiring a link to gmoccpy-hu.
I think it would be safe to rename the anchor in gmoccopy-hu from
[[cha:gmoccapy]] to [[cha:gmoccapy-hu]].
I tried it here and all
Check that the document anchor is what you expect in the document.
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master/docs/asciidoc-markup.txt
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master/docs/src/gui/gmoccapy-hu.txt
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master/docs/src/gui/gmoccapy.txt
