Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latencytests-firstimpressions

2023-12-28 Thread andy pugh
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 20:35, Rod Webster wrote: > Its really too late to offer solutions now, get behind the current build > process and work with it. You mean where I build the images by hand over the course of weeks? I don't think that's the ideal solution. -- atp "A motorcycle is a

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latencytests-firstimpressions

2023-12-28 Thread Rob M
Whilst I do have a cross compile setup, I did no such thing regarding a buildbot. I did offer my hardware for use, to which I received no reply, so I didn't bother with putting together a buildbot. On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 7:35 AM Rod Webster wrote: > The old buildbot ran on a pi but it was not

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latencytests-firstimpressions

2023-12-28 Thread Rod Webster
The old buildbot ran on a pi but it was not robust and often pulled the whole system down. Rob M built a cross compiled buildbot solution using what we use for the official images but there was no response. To fix the buildbot somebody in charge of it actually has to want to fix it. Its really

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latencytests-firstimpressions

2023-12-28 Thread gene heskett
On 12/28/23 09:05, Andy Pugh wrote: On 28 Dec 2023, at 12:55, gene heskett wrote: Any chance of updating the buildbots page yellow table? I can’t. I have no access to the buildbot. Anyway, the buildbot doesn’t build anything for arm64. Is that a lack of hardware? I have offered some in