Lab Equipment/WEEE RoHS

2003-06-11 Thread Joe P Martin
Greetings I am trying to determine whether our laboratory equipment is required to comply with the RoHS and WEEE Directives at this time. We do have some instruments for use as IVD and realize that they do fall under the scope of the WEEE Directive as Category 8 Medical Devices: Laboratory

Safety standard

2003-06-11 Thread drcuthb...@micron.com
Question on which safety standard to use: The item is a piece of test equipment that was designed in-house for use in-house. It will be shipped to Europe. Is the correct safety standard EN 61010-1? Thanks. Dave Cuthbert Micron Technology This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product

RE: FDA registration of laser

2003-06-11 Thread Peter L. Tarver
Chris - Your rationale for not resubmitting is valid *if* the GBICs are Certified as Class I (I haven't seen one yet that isn't). Your rationale for resubmitting is missing some what ifs. Specifically, if you remove (or cover with a label) any of the required markings or use the device outside

Re: FDA registration of laser

2003-06-11 Thread garymcintu...@aol.com
Nope, you are absolutely correct on the GBIC's or the new smaller pluggable LC connector optics. You are just a distributor of those under the laser guidelines. Again, its a fully contained module that you make no changes to, and they have no controls or failure modes that you could induce to

RE: LED Emissions

2003-06-11 Thread richwo...@tycoint.com
The answer to my questions can be found in Clause 5.2.2.4 of TR 60825-9. A rectangular aperture is required for oblong sources and the method of measurement is presented in that clause - it isn't easy. Sigh. -Original Message- From: WOODS, RICHARD Sent: Wednesday, June 11,

RE: FCC and Hi Temp operation

2003-06-11 Thread Kurt Fischer
My recommendation is to look at the radio performance issues as well as the regulatory. It is possible that you have no FCC compliance issues but the radio does not perform! The FCC could not care less if your radio works or not. Kurt Kurt Fischer HYPER Corporation 1279 Quarry Lane, Suite

RE: FDA registration of laser

2003-06-11 Thread Chris Maxwell
I want to leech off of this question; I hope that I don't get it off track. We currently produce a module that use GBICs. For the unfamiliar, a GBIC is an optical transceiver for gigabit ethernet. Our quality personnel handle CDRH submissions; and our current thinking is that we don't need to

RE: FCC and Hi Temp operation

2003-06-11 Thread Barbara Judge
Hi Chuck, The device in question would fall under 15.247, which has no extreme temperature requirement in the U.S. If the WLAN device was tested for use in the EU the European Norm (EN 300 328) does involve extreme temperature testing of -20 to +55 C, unless it is for indoor use or controlled

Re: FCC and Hi Temp operation

2003-06-11 Thread garymcintu...@aol.com
The first thing to do is to check the component temperature ratings to see if you will even meet the parts manufacturers operating limits. Many commercial components are rated at 70C, meaning that the parts vendors only guarantee the operation up to that point, after that you are on you

FCC and Hi Temp operation

2003-06-11 Thread Burns, Chuck
Hello, everyone. We are integrating a purchased 802.11b device into our product, but face ambient temperature requirements up to 80 degrees C. This brings up two problems: 1. Will it work at that temperature? One vendor advertises 55 degrees max, another 70 but with an offer to screen products

Re: Site Atten. and Field Uniformity

2003-06-11 Thread lfresea...@aol.com
Hi Bob, this is something that my lab does. We use network analyzers for NSA, and Field uniformity from 26 MHz to 4 GHz if you need that. While we are not A2LA accredited yet, we hope to be soon. Sincerely, Derek N. Walton Owner L F Research EMC Design and Test Facility Poplar Grove, Illinois,

Re: FDA registration of laser

2003-06-11 Thread David Heald
Kim, You DO need to register. Testing may not be required, but is strongly encouraged regardless (technically you can refer to the laser component manufacturer's results). Note: This is assuming that you aren't just putting an off the shelf enclosed CD/DVD ROM drive in a system, which

LED Emissions

2003-06-11 Thread richwo...@tycoint.com
I am attempting to measure, in accordance with IEC 60825-1+A1 +A2, the size of the apparent source of a LED plastic fiber optic driver when the fiber is removed. The driver assembly consists of a visible red LED, clear magnifying lens and a barrel into which the 2.2 mm dia plastic fiber cable is

FW: Interconnecting Cables

2003-06-11 Thread richwo...@tycoint.com
I didn't receive any comments at all, so I am trying again. Any comments would be welcomed. -Original Message- From: WOODS, RICHARD Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:58 AM To: 'emc-pstc' Subject: Interconnecting Cables I need to determine the robustness

RE: FDA registration of laser

2003-06-11 Thread Peter L. Tarver
Kim - If the drive is already certified as a Class 1 laser product and you do not modify it or remove any of the required markings, you don't need to do anything, irrespective of the internal laser source's laser class.Refer to Laser Notice 42 at

Home appliances and EN61000-3-2 (harmonics of input current)

2003-06-11 Thread gunter_j_ma...@embraco.com.br
Dear colleagues Please, correct me if I am wrong ... After January, 2004, the current amendment A14 to EN61000-3-2 will be imcorporated to the Standard. So, who were Class A will continue to be Class A. Is there any activitie that foresses a new classification of products ? Nowadays, our

RE: FDA registration of laser

2003-06-11 Thread FastWave
No registration is required if: 1) You put a Class I laser product into your product (in its entirety) and your product is Class I. 2) You include the documentation that came with the laser product with your product. 3) You leave all the labeling on the laser product as you received. There is an

Re: FDA registration of laser

2003-06-11 Thread T.Sato
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:54:36 +0200, Kim Boll Jensen k...@bolls.dk wrote: When using a CD or DVD driver in a product (PC or audio product) and the driver is FDA registered, do I need to register the final product at FDA too. I can't find a paragraph in 21 CFR which tells me when not to

Site Atten. and Field Uniformity

2003-06-11 Thread rehel...@mmm.com
I am looking for a company in the US that will perform site attenuation and field uniformity for us. We normally generate our own data but this year we are looking for an independent verification. Bob Heller 3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01 St. Paul, MN 55107-1208 Tel: 651- 778-6336 Fax:

RE: New Approach Directives and DOA and DOW

2003-06-11 Thread Nick Williams
I'm not going to disagree with Neil's approach (indeed I endorse it), but I would observe that the Construction Products Directive (CPD) is different to the other New Approach Directives in this (and many other!) respects, in that CE marking is not possible for products within the scope of

RE: FDA registration of laser

2003-06-11 Thread Colgan, Chris
As far as I know, yes, you have to register the actual product with the FDA. That's what I have always done anyway. The fact that the driver is FDA registered will make it a fairly simple paperwork exercise. If you think about it, customs will not be able to associate the driver's FDA accession

RE: New Approach Directives and DOA and DOW

2003-06-11 Thread Barker, Neil
I would agree with you. Providing that the CPD has been enacted in the law of the Member State in which you wish to market your product, and that appropriate routes to compliance are available, then it should be your decision to take that route to market in preference to the former national

FDA registration of laser

2003-06-11 Thread Kim Boll Jensen
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Hi all good people Just a simple question. When using a CD or DVD driver in a product (PC or audio product) and the driver is FDA registered, do I need to register the final product at FDA too. I can't find a paragraph in 21 CFR which tells me when