Double copies

2003-11-30 Thread David Sproul
Dear group, Is it just me or is anyone else receiving each message twice? Best regards, David Sproul.

Re: SV: Who is responsible?

2003-11-30 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in LFENJLPMMJB mhpeibniloepncpaa.am...@westin-emission.no) about 'SV: Who is responsible?' on Sun, 30 Nov 2003: Thanks to all of you. I'm a bit surprised to see this question raised in 2003. It was very commonly asked several years ago.

RE: IEC 60950 Clause 6 questions

2003-11-30 Thread Ilan Cohen
Rob I'll try to keep my answers short and to the point. 1) Standard is very clear, test of 6.1.2.1 is not required since you are bonding the unit to earth and providing clear installation instructions that specify that. 2) Coax is typically regarded as SELV since it is not used for TNV type

SV: Who is responsible?

2003-11-30 Thread am...@westin-emission.no
Thanks to all of you. I'm a bit surprised to see this question raised in 2003. It was very commonly asked several years ago. New folks are entering this forum .. and some of the present members (me included!...) may need repetition, repetition, repetition Yes, I am running out of

UNSUBSCRIBE

2003-11-30 Thread david.gra...@realcompliance.com

Re: Operation of a Radio Device in the 88-108MHz Frequency Range

2003-11-30 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that ITL-EMC User Group itl-...@itl.co.il wrote (in 2D1037012914D4118DB8204C4F4F5020275AD9@ITLLTD01) about 'Operation of a Radio Device in the 88-108MHz Frequency Range' on Mon, 1 Dec 2003: 1. One of our customers would like to operate a short range device,

Operation of a Radio Device in the 88-108MHz Frequency Range

2003-11-30 Thread ITL-EMC User Group
Dear Colleagues, 1. One of our customers would like to operate a short range device, transmitting FM music in the 88-108MHz band to an adjacent radio (2-3m distance) RF power 0dBm. 2. Is the above possible in the EU countries? 3. Thanks for any help. Regards Shaike Raz EMC Laboratory Manager