Position Open, NECA, Director of Safety

2008-07-24 Thread Arthur Michael
Hello all, This opening crossed my desk earlier today; please contact Earl Hopgood, agency contact listed at the end of this message if interested. I have no further details and I'm passing this along as a courtesy to Earl. Regards, Art Michael = NECA, Director of Sa

RE: Another Cancer Scare?

2008-07-24 Thread Tang, George
My personal opinion is that the research findings MAY have some valid points, however, the data they have is way out-dated. We know that in the late '80s, people use mobile phones that put out several watts of radiated power. In the early '90s when cell phones were just starting to appear on t

Re: 300 440

2008-07-24 Thread Mark Briggs
Bob - >From memory 300 440 does address measurements for devices that use FHSS. EN 300 440 may be suitable if the product is being used under the EU allocation for Non Specific Short Range Devices rather than the allocation for Wideband Data Transmission Systems incl RLANs that would use EN 300

new video podcast "A Scope Probe can Fool You"

2008-07-24 Thread Doug Smith
Hi All, Just finished this week's video podcast (a little early) on a source of error in oscilloscope probe measurements. The video runs about three minutes. There are two ways to view it: 1) Go to my video podcast page at: http://emcesd-podcast.com/weekly_podcasts/weekly_podcast.mp4 The arc

Re: Another Cancer Scare?

2008-07-24 Thread John Woodgate
In message <48886eff.1060...@aol.com>, dated Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Derek Walton writes: >Does anyone know more about the research spoken about in the BBC news >artical? > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7523109.stm > >Is it really new unpublisged research or just rehashing the old? Probably n

Another Cancer Scare?

2008-07-24 Thread Derek Walton
Does anyone know more about the research spoken about in the BBC news artical? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7523109.stm Is it really new unpublisged research or just rehashing the old? Sincerely, Derek Walton L F Research - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Socie

300 440

2008-07-24 Thread reheller
Does ETSI EN 300 440 cover FHSS transmitters in the 2.4 GHz range? I have a wireless mouse in this range that has a test report done to 300 440 and I am wondering if this device should have been done to 300 328 or is 300 440 good enough? Thanks, Bob Heller St. Paul, MN 55107-1208 Tel: 651- 778-63