EN61010 + UL508C

All EN 61010-1:2001, Section 9.3 Limited-energy circuit states that one of the criterion for a circuit to be deemed a limited energy circuit : b1) the maximum available current is limited inherently or by impedance so that it cannot exceed the relevant value of table 13; Looking at Table 13

Castors/trolley for heavy equipment

Someone posted a request for information about castor specifications for heavy equipment, but I can't find it in the archives. I mentioned a mathematical analysis of the stability of wheeled trolleys but could not find it. I have now found it, and can make it available to anyone who is

Re: EN61010 + UL508C

In message 5d39f9c94199f64fa82e5809c702aa7c01469...@z-160-100-30-229.est.ibm.com, dated Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Gordon,Ian ian.gor...@edwardsvacuum.com writes: Looking at Table 13 for a DC voltage of between 20 - 30V(inclusive) the maximum available current is 8A. What does the maximum available

EIRP/ERP requirements

Dear experts, Anyone that could help me with the following questions? In which standards can I find the FCC requirements for output power (ERP/EIRP) for UMTS 850 MHz (band V) and UMTS 1900 MHz (band II)? In which standard can I find the EU requirements for output power (ERP/EIRP) for UMTS

CISPR 24

Regards All, Does anyone know if CISPR 24:1997 (or it's ammendments A1 and A2) call out radiated immunity testing above 1GHz? I'm aware that EN55024 does not. I don't happen to have a copy of the CISPR document on hand and a question came up.

[SPAM] 2 job openings at Garmin International

Growth is requiring us to expand the Compliance team at Garmin. The 2 positions are located at the Garmin campus in Olathe, KS (beautiful suburb of Kansas City). Check out Kansas City at www.thinkkc.com file://www.thinkkc.com #1) Company: Garmin International Job Title: Handset Regulatory

RE: CISPR 24

It does not, nor will it. Immunity testing above 1 GHz for ITE and other devices will be left to CISPR 35 when it is published in 2 or 3 years. Ghery S. Pettit Convener, CISPR SC I WG3 From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of

EN 62133

Dear Members, Is EN 62133: 2003 identical to IEC 62133: 2002? Is it an EU harmonized standard? If yes, which directive is this standard being categorized to? Thank you and look forward to your help. Best regards, Grace Lin -

Myanmar and Laos Approvals

Dear Group Members, Does anyone know any mandatory requirements for safety/emc/radio/telecom for a notebook with wlan. BT and PSTN modem in Myanmar and Laos? Thanks, Peter - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety

Re: EN 62133

In message 2a93eb060808261215y52bc606s5bda0b3ac051d...@mail.gmail.com, dated Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Grace Lin graceli...@gmail.com writes: Is EN 62133: 2003 identical to IEC 62133: 2002?  No EN is absolutely identical to the IEC standard with the same reference. For example, where possible the EN

Re: EN 62133

Hello Grace, I can elaborate a little on Mr. Woodgate's comments. I did two quick checks. The CB Scheme web site shows no national deviations to IEC 62133. Also, the DKE web site indicates that DIN EN 62133 is just the German translation of IEC 62133 and indicates no national deviations other

Re: EN 62133

At 20:41 +0100 26/8/08, John Woodgate wrote: Snip good stuff I agree with... If yes, which directive is this standard being categorized to? I don't think any Directive other than the General Product Safety Directive is involved, and that Directive doesn't have notified standards. Not

Re: EN 62133

In message p06240823c4da17937a9a@[192.168.1.40], dated Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Nick Williams nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk writes: At 20:41 +0100 26/8/08, John Woodgate wrote: Snip good stuff I agree with... If yes, which directive is this standard being categorized to? I don't think any

RE: EN 62133

In the past, IEC 60950-1 for CB Certification has been accepted by many test houses for batteries that claim some relation to ITE equipment. More recently, we have been required to also evaluate the battery to IEC 62133 before they would even consider issuing a CB Certificate to IEC 60950-1. Has

GR-950-CORE Salt Fog Test

Can anyone comment on the periods of real world exposure the tests (30 days or 60 days) the test is intended to represent? One reference I found points to ASTM B117, but I don't have access to that standard to see if it's contained in there. Peter Tarver ptar...@ieee.org - This message is

RE: GR-950-CORE Salt Fog Test

Peter, MIL-STD 810 includes the following references, although I am not sure if they will answer your question. 6. REFERENCE/RELATED DOCUMENTS. a. AR 70-38, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation of Materiel for Extreme Climatic Conditions. b. MIL-HDBK-310, Global Climatic Data for