When I can be mistaken for Kipling -- even Kipling on an off day -- that is
high praise indeed,
WRT the physics degrees... my manager has mentioned that the same math taught
him in Physics courses was dry, and the engineering approach was interesting.
But on these matters I am at
Hi Group
Does anyone have any recommendations for environmental test standards
(vibration,, shock, temp, humidity etc) for sensitive test and measurement
equipment that will be transported around a lot.
We normally use MIL-PRF-28800F but my manager has decided that this isn’t
severe enough
If your product is being transported in packaging or a transportation case,
you may consider ISTA standards.
http://www.ista.org/
For general testing, look at the IEC 60068 series. There are standards for
individual environmental tests and some for combined testing. Take a look at
IEC
John,
MIL-STD-810, G is the latest release. It has enough severity in profiles and
justifications for selection to satisfy most management.
Good luck,
Doug Kramer
Lab Manager
NCEE Labs
Product Compliance Solutions
Phone: 402.472.5880
Toll Free: 1.888.567.6860
Fax: 402.472.5881
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA48905340B@ZEUS.cetest.local,
Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl writes
For example, an audio in amplifier specified on its frequency
range and input sensitivity, not on what it does with
input frequencies above this range, nor what happens
if the input
Mil-Std 810
EIA/TIA 603
EIA 374
US Forest Service (USDA) Land Mobile Radio Standard
empirical data
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of
John Harrington
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 1:16 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:
Hi Group
Does anyone have any
I’ve followed this thread and even contributed to it. I chose to reply to
this post by random selection.
Perhaps it is an axiom of life that those who have labored to gain special
skills (perhaps even wisdom) tend to berate those younger, less expert persons
who come behind them. They are
On 12/17/2008, Peter Merguerian wrote:
See attached for the analog modem requirements.
Hi Peter:
Thanks, this contains most of the unusual requirements I recall seeing in
2003. Note that this specification is for analog modems, not specifically fax
machines. As I recall, there was
8 matches
Mail list logo