It used to be EN50178. Not sure if that got rolled into a part 2 of 60947 or
separate Standard.
- Reply message -
From: Ted Eckert ted.eck...@microsoft.com
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Fri, Jan 21, 2011 3:51 pm
Subject: [PSES] Motor controller standards
To:
Hello Doug,
I’ll tackle the North American side of this discussion. I believe UL 508C
http://ulstandardsinfonet.ul.com/scopes/scopes.asp?fn=0508C.html is the
standard for the United States. Its scope states “These requirements cover
open or enclosed equipment that supplies power to control
Doug,
For the motor drives, take a look at the EN 61800 series of standards.
I'd also be wary of using EN 60950-1, at least on its own, for the processors.
If safety is involved (which it is if there are emergency stops involved) then
you have a significantly bigger can of worms on your
Does anyone know the status of this IEEE Standards development project
(P299.1)? It was set to expire in Dec 2010 and I am trying to find a resource
as to its voting status and likelihood of passing.
Thanks,
Doug
-
This message
In message df8c703f-1bad-4662-932f-b323d2345...@mac.com, dated Fri, 21
Jan 2011, Doug Nix d...@mac.com writes:
I am considering using EN 60950-1 as the base standard for the system
as it uses some integrated industrial PC's, but I'm a bit stumped on
what the appropriate electrical safety
Would 61010-1 be the better base as it appears to be a control device?
-Doug
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Doug Nix
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 3:00 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Motor controller standards
All,
I am
All,
I am consulting with a client that builds automation equipment used with chain
and wire rope hoists. The system is comprised of a group of modules that can
be connected via ethernet with a control console, auxilliary modules and hoist
motor controllers to build a customized system.
I am
Ignore that last
Bob Heller
3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651-778-6336
Fax: 651-778-6252
- Forwarded by Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US on 01/21/2011 09:06 AM
-
From: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
List-Post:
Bob Heller
3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651-778-6336
Fax: 651-778-6252 -
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
David,
Yes, if you are calibrating as a 50 ohm system.
I believe it is actually preferred to add the 150-50 ohm adapters and calibrate
as a 150 ohm system, though. Check out the diagram at the top of the last page
of this document:
Hello David,
You are correct for the BCI clamp.
And if calibrating a CDN for 10V then it would be 140dBuV (Uo) – 15.6dB =
124.4dBuV (Umr) on the spectrum analyser.
But for either of these calibrations, do use an watty attenuator also (because
you don’t want to overload the spectrum
11 matches
Mail list logo
