As many know, the LVD is in the process of being recast for alignment with the
New Legislative Framework (NLF).
The Commission proposed text, (COM(2011) 773 final), calls for what looks like
a unique equipment identification number do be provided in the Declaration of
Conformity (DoC). The sam
1. Science = theoretical; Engineering = empirical
2. Concur with Mr. Nute. Have empirical data indicating hammer test not
consistent, and that the steel ball test results are repeatable for similar
construction and test condition.
3. There is no reason to deviate from the standard because you are o
According to the spec sheet, the TOS3200 excludes medical purposes.
Check out ED&D Model LT-601.
On 1/8/2013 6:09 PM, sudhakar wasnik wrote:
Kikusui TOS3200
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Socie
Hi Sudakar:
No, the tests are not the same because the energy
is not the only parameter. One must consider both
the impact area and the elasticity of the collision.
The ball is 50 mm diameter while the impact hammer is
20 mm diameter.
In some cases, the 20 mm sphere will contact a part
whi
Hi Dan,
I just wanted to know if you wanted some of the photos of the PSES2012 symposium to put on the PSES website. Just let me know if there is an FTP site or I can send you the photos in batches by email.
Thanks.
Richard
-
5 matches
Mail list logo