Please forgive me if this is a repeat.
Does anyone have experience buying Standards from Estonia using the MultiUser
Licence? Do they still use FileOpen to control what computers can open the
files like they do with a single user license or do they have a way of limiting
how many different
Hi Brian,
I recently purchased a multi-user (2) license for Estonian standards. I've
opened them on more than one computer with no issues. It, however, would not
download from an intranet site. Opening from a directory from multiple
computers seems to work fine.
Regards,
Mike
On Mar 4,
Brian,
It’s been a few months since I’ve bought one from Estonia but I buy all mine
with multi-user (2) licenses and for this no special software is required to
view the files and there are no programmatically enforced restrictions. We
don’t normally have more than 1 or 2 users looking at a
Rich,
Thanks for forcing my brain into another frame of mind. I had not thought
of it in exactly that way until I read your comment. The statements we are
discussing are either those prescribed by the applicable standard, or more
often, the CYA type statements we all include in our users guides
Brian,
The FileOpen control is not in place on the multiuser copies of their
standards. I store our copies on a network drive with limited access to about
50 users. I purchase the 2 license copy of it the standard knowing that it
will be rare that more than 2 will use it at the same time.
Same message I've been communicating here internally as well. Management
certainly supports and expects to have it right the first time but educating on
what needs to happen and by who to accomplish that seems to be a recurring
theme.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate
In message
blupr0701mb8208f224b64620d128b43e9e3...@blupr0701mb820.namprd07.prod.out
look.com, dated Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Brian Ceresney bceres...@delta-q.com
writes:
As a matter of fact, it is very difficult to get our engineers to
take an interest in reading and understanding the standards at
Re use the signal words for other purposes than potential injury:
1. Windows 95, I think it was, broadly corrupted the exclamation point/triangle
hazard symbol by placing it in their pop up system error boxes. I'm glad to see
that this is no longer practiced.
2. I once had a discussion at a
Hello All,
My experiences with purchasing 2 copies of the Estonian standards are similar
to those who have replied.
It’s very rare that another person is reading a standard at the same time as I
am. As a matter of fact, it is very difficult to get our engineers to take an
interest in reading
Dear Members,
Could someone please advise EN test standards (LVD and EMCD) for a
Sous Vide Water Immersion Circulator, such as the one found from
Amazon at
http://www.amazon.com/Anova-Sous-Vide-Immersion-Circulator/dp/B00GT753W8?
The one interested incorporates a submersed induction motor in
Hello Grace,
Consider IEC 60335-2-73 or IEC 60335-2-74 for the immersion heater portion.
These standards do have some requirements for motors. I can only see the index,
so I don't know how they would apply to the circulation pump.
Ted Eckert
Compliance Engineer
Microsoft Corporation
In message
cajq2vahd+pitmbauosoaaidbjwnpqtfnfa99jqwha83twyj...@mail.gmail.com,
dated Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Grace Lin graceli...@gmail.com writes:
I took a quick look at the list of EMC harmonized standards, the
possible standards are:
EN 55014-1 and EN 55014-2
Those are correct.
EN 60730-1,
Software, where not safety-critical, is a different subject. Microsoft has
published several design guides (most are on the MSDN site) and has several
long web pages that instruct and admonish programmers about the proper use of
the various dialog boxes and how to phrase and title the dialog
Many years ago, a group of RD engineers came to
me and said: We want to learn about product
safety, but we don't want to read the standards.
The result was the HBSE course.
If the product safety engineer does his job, there
will be no test failures.
Best regards,
Rich
-Original
Hi Rich,
What about warning the customer against foreseeable misuse of the product that
might be hazardous? I’ve seen the signal words used for instance where the
warnings says something like “Do not dispose of the battery by incineration” or
: Do not attempt to dry out this cell phone in a
In message 007001d056ec$5efaf500$1cf0df00$@ieee.org, dated Wed, 4 Mar
2015, Richard Nute ri...@ieee.org writes:
If the product safety engineer does his job, there will be no test
failures.
But between the first model assessment and the final 'pass' there will
be costly design changes and
Dear experts,
Is anyone familiar with construction of electronic backfeed protection in UPS?
When user or service engineer disconnects UPS terminal/connector from mains
supply, only electronic components / semiconductors are protecting the
user/service engineer from internal hazardous
17 matches
Mail list logo
