Hi Doug and the group,
The picture with three arcs was from one frame of a 60 frame/sec short
video I took while another person held the generator. So it was not a
time exposure. I think there was only one active spark and the other
paths were in the process of extinguishing as they did not
So my incorrect assumption was that this was not a single (capacitive?)
discharge event, but a continuous arc?
What frequency range carries the current? All above 1MHz?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 10:58 AM
To:
The first picture of Doug is not so surprising...
The next one with the blue corona cloud and at least three discharges is
interesting. Was the HV increasing on a ramp of some kind? It is apparent this
was a long exposure photo and the corona cloud was visible long enough to be
captured in
I agree and what Charlie and Rodney both said is also right on. That is the
due diligence part of the process - you asked, or at least I thought you
asked, what the legal issues were and how to resolve them so Company B can
place their product on the EU Market.
Steve Brody
That works perfectly, thanks!! I still would want so see company A's Technical
File.
John Allen | President | Product Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsourced Compliance Department®
http://www.productsafetyinc.com
630-238-0188
Interesting. Two questions:
1. Is the discharge actually multi-path(parallel), or is the image exposed for
period of time where multiple, sequential streamers were recorded?
2. Would there not also be significant current flowing that is less than the
1MHz rating of the probe?
Brian
(Re-sending)
Hi Ken,
To take HDMI as an example, it defines a transfer function for the clock
recovery PLL with a cut off above 4MHz. My understanding is that this is the
loop response of the receivers clock recovery PLL meaning that jitter
frequencies below this cut off are tracked but
If you have a review of the bluebook it is clear that Manufacturer B is now
the "MANUFACTURER" and must meet the obligations associated with being the
manufacturer. I agree with Charlie, to limit your liabilities... reports etc
and perhaps even a quick verification test may be in order.,
test
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Schaefer, David
wrote:
> There’s a separate question on CISPR 35 I would like answered – are they
> going to use pulse modulation for the spot frequencies? As Rob mentioned,
> the requirement could be up to 30 V/m. If you’re intended
9 matches
Mail list logo