Hi Michael,
Since the new HS list for EMCD does not include EN 55013 and EN 55020 for
broadcast receivers, should we use the HS of 16/01/2015 until the EMC HS
appears in RED. Your given guidance document is no longer applicable for this
scenario. A new HS has been issued twice for the new
Treat the omissions as errors and continue to use 55013 and 55020 until June
next year, or officially told not to. By that time, ETSI may have published
their replacements.
You can't use 55024 because its Scope doesn't allow it. The Generic
61000-6-1 wouldn't give p[resumption of conformity.
Wi
Hello,
You are correct that you can continue to use the EMCD and LVD until the end
of the RED transition period.
(See this useful document:
http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/11983/attachments/1/translations/en/r
enditions/native )
It's true that if the standards are not listed in t
Thanks for highlighting this Ron.
Neither EN55013 nor EN55020 (broadcast receiver emission and immunity) appear
in the list for 2014/30/EU; they were listed in the OJ under the previous EMC
Directive for many years.
Broadcast receivers now fall under the RED rather than the EMC directive, but
Hello Amund,
EN 60950-1 is the European adoption of IEC 60950-1 adopted by CENELEC. When IEC
TC 108 issues amendments to IEC 60950-1, the amendments are numbered
sequentially starting at 1. When CENELEC adopts these amendments as EN 60950-1
amendments, they get the same numbering. However, CENE
Hello all,
I've been interested to see the range of comments on this question. Thank you
all for taking the time to help. I'm going to investigate further!
Regards,
James
_
From: Pawson, James
Sent: 10 August 2016 17:01
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
How is the amendment history for the CENELEC version of EN60950-1?
First, publication of A1, then A11 and then A12. At last A2 ...
But A11 is a 2009 version while A1 is one year later (2010). Does it mean
that A11 was issued before A1?
Today, all amendments listed in OJ (A1, A11, A12, A2) apply
7 matches
Mail list logo
