Re: [PSES] IEC/ANSI/UL/CSA 60950-1 ed.2 Mains Vrms vs Vpeak

Hi Doug; Have you taken a look at IEC 60664 to see if has a similar statement or provides any clarification? Maybe what you're seeing is just a mistake in 60950-1, 2nd ed... -Ken On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Doug Powell wrote: > All, > > I am reviewing the requirements

[PSES] IEC/ANSI/UL/CSA 60950-1 ed.2 Mains Vrms vs Vpeak

All, I am reviewing the requirements of "*2.10.3.3 Clearances in primary circuits" *and it seems interesting to me that the math is off by just a little bit. In particular "For an AC MAINS SUPPLY not exceeding 300 V r.m.s. (420 V peak)". When in actuality the calculated peak of 300 Vrms is 424

[PSES] looking for CE Marking and Consultation for user guide/Manual, packaging

We are looking for CE Marking and Consultation services for CE products.Consultant services can be in US or Europe. Our products are Wifi AP and switch, RF expertise for CE products is preferred, User manual, Label, warning statements. for more info you can find on

Re: [PSES] European wire numbering?

All, I wanted to let the list know that I have determined the answer to my question, as there may be others who could benefit from what I have learned. The basis for electrotechnical documentation is IEC 61082-1. This standard is referenced in IEC 60204-1 and many other locations. In IEC

Re: [PSES] Radiated RF electromagnetic fields immunity test on ambulatory electrocardiographic system

Thank you Gert, yes you are right, it is an ambulatory electrocardiographic system. I omitted to mention that on the main part of email, sorry, I only put it on the subject. Best regards, Silvia De: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen [mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl] Enviado el: