Thanks to all who replied. Response from this great forum was such that my
DEF STAN 59-41 collection pushed back from the early 2000s through the 1990s
and all the way back to 1986, which is as far as I needed to go.
Y¹all are a great resource!
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Ken Javor
Perhaps. But my experience has been refusal of any reasonable carrier to write
a policy for an institution where equipment does not meet code or does not bear
the mark of an NRTL. The exception for exposure to unsafe and/or non-certified
equipment typically used for engineering labs is found in
Hi all,
Good afternoon,
I would like to clarify is it true that some insurance companies will charge
lower insurance premium (e.g. fire insurance) if the insured party can show
evidence of using equipment that are certified for safety compliance with NRTL
marking ?
Example, a hospital will need
Hi to all as it’s been a while since I’ve posted. I’m now enjoying retirement
after a brief and final regulatory stint.
Anyway, this regulatory job posting came my way (see below) and I suggested
forwarding it to this group. Hopefully it will be of some interest for some of
you.
Please
Re: At any rate, as Mr. Woodgate points out the manufacturer is left (once
again) to argue and defend his or her position.
In Europe, It is considered (by the authorities, anyway) that ‘argue and
defend’ is a freedom, not a restriction. It’s the only viable converse of the
‘everything that is
5 matches
Mail list logo
