[PSES] Labeling - battery operated products

At least for CE marking purposes, there are no requirements for any battery related information on the product label. But then I came into this web-site / document: http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/cargo/dgr/Documents/lithium-battery-guidance-document-2017-en.pdf Should a product (with

Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling

Hi Mark, RRA notice 2015-26 and KATS announcement (date 4/26/2016) include this information. Click on the following shortcut for KATS ( Not available in English unfortunately). http://kats.go.kr/cwsboard/board.do?mode=download=128=18555=18555_201605021103214061.pdf   Thanks,Ben Sent from Yahoo

Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling

Thank you Ben, Is there a link to this that is accessible? Is it on the RRA or KATS site? Regards, Mark From: Ben Kim [mailto:benki...@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 1:42 PM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling Mark, e-labelling

Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling

Mark, e-labelling is acceptable in S.Korea. Both RRA and KATS allows manufacture to use e-label (in lieu of physical label) for the product that has its own display (such as smartphone).  Thanks, Ben  On Thursday, September 7, 2017 9:23 AM, "Schmidt, Mark" wrote:

[PSES] Composite Systems and Intentional Radiators

Hello, I am soliciting help in the interpretation of FCC rules as to what makes an intentional radiator and the application of standards as a result. The scenario: A product is designed and tested as an unintentional radiator and 15.109/15.107 and/or ANSI C63.4 etc test levels and methods are

[PSES] KC Mark E labeling

Hello Group, Can anyone direct me to information concerning e labeling of a Bluetooth module and Device. We are currently marking the FCC, IC and KC ID physically on the product label but we ran out of room due to an OEM request on one of our products. I understand that FCC and IC accept e

Re: [PSES] SV: [PSES] TEMPEST and EMC

Ed, I conducted TEMPEST tests and mitigation on SINCGARS radios too. Amund, the TEMPEST test procedures are classified. Don Gies ddg...@verizon.net (732) 207-7828 From: Edward Price [mailto:e...@jwjelp.com] Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 5:20 AM To:

Re: [PSES] SV: [PSES] TEMPEST and EMC

Oh yes.  One reason I was hired to do EMC testing after  i retired from the US Army in 1983 was that I had a current SECRET clearance.   THAT'S long gone. Heh! Cortland Richmond larance. On 9/7/2017 2:22 AM, Amund Westin wrote: I was looking for the document NSTISSAM TEMPEST/1-92

Re: [PSES] SV: [PSES] TEMPEST and EMC

Amund: In TEMPEST testing, both the limits and the data were considered classified information. Don: The conflation of TEMPEST and 461 probably arose from the fact that most all equipment requiring TEMPEST compliance was being bought by DoD agencies, and they also required 461 compliance. As

[PSES] SV: [PSES] TEMPEST and EMC

I was looking for the document NSTISSAM TEMPEST/1-92 «Compromising Emanations Laboratory Test Requirements, Electromagnetics», but I only found a file with all emission plots covered by a black spot. Classified information? BR Amund Fra: Don Gies [mailto:ddg...@verizon.net]