David,
I think you will find that this is a valid page but since the URL is so long,
part of it drops to the next line. When you click on it, the part that dropped
off doesn't get included in the address. If you manually enter the part of the
URL that dropped off it will take you to the proper
Hi Lisa,
I believe a screened cable would be a shielded cable.
Bill Fleury
-Original Message-
From: lisa_cef...@mksinst.com [mailto:lisa_cef...@mksinst.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:15 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Definition ?
Hi all,
Could anyone
Richard,
I have three different articles about this subject. I think I found them on
CDs from recent IEEE EMC Symposiums but I don't remember which ones or even
if they were all on the same CD. I saved the files so I can e-mail them to
you if you wish; as I don't think the files are that big.
Hi All,
Does anyone know what IEC 48D (Secretariat) 76 would be? It is called out
in the IEEE 1386:2001 standard for CMC cards as shock and vibration
requirements. I assumed that IEC 48D was a standard but apparently that is
not the case. SC 48D is a Subcommittee dealing with Mechanical
Jose,
Try http://astimage.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/
Best regards,
Bill Fleury
-Original Message-
From: Jose Miguel Río [mailto:j...@advancedshielding.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:07 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: MIL-STD 2194
Hi again folks,
One
Brodie,
For Mil Stds go to http://astimage.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ Some standards
are not available in PDF format to download but are available in hard copy
and are still free. You just have to set up a customer number and order the
desired standard via fax or e-mail. This is a great resource!
You might try:
www.conec.com
www.midcom-inc.com
www.regalusa.com
Regards and Happy Holidays!
Bill Fleury
-Original Message-
From: Reginald Henry [mailto:rhe...@vicon-cctv.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:51 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE:RJ45 filtered
Hi All,
My apologies if this is slightly off topic for this list but I thought that,
with the wealth of knowledge out there, this would be a good place to start.
Has anyone out there had any experience with testing a product for
compliance to IEC 60721-3 (Classification of environmental
You have quite the library!
Bill Fleury
-Original Message-
From: wojciech_ba...@nmss.com [mailto:wojciech_ba...@nmss.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:20 PM
To: Dan Kwok
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org; marti...@appliedbiosystems.com;
owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
I would also recommend Printed Circuit Board Design Techniques For EMC
Compliance, 2nd Edition, by Mark Montrose.
Well written, easy to follow and many good illustrations.
Regards,
Bill Fleury
-Original Message-
From: John Howard [mailto:jhow...@emcguru.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
Brian,
When you checked with UL did you mention that these numbers were on cables?
2725 and 2835 are AWM Style numbers. If you go to UL's web site and click on
Customers and then Wire and Cable and look under AWM Styles you can do a
search for specific style numbers, file numbers etc. This will
I believe wire gauge might be an issue as well.
Bill Fleury
-Original Message-
From: Russell, Ray [mailto:ray_russ...@gastmfg.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 6:46 AM
To: 'Cameron O'phee'; 'EMC - PSTC Forum'
Subject: RE: Australian power cable requirements.
Cameron,
I had a
Richard,
For shielded ports/cables the method used should be the current clamp method
as described in C.1.2 of Annex C, EN 55022:1998. The ISN is used for
unshielded ports/cables. We had the same problem of failing conducted
emissions when we used an ISN. When you put a current clamp on a
All,
Correct me if I'm reading too much into this but I believe that if you read
far enough in 15.19 it says that if the device is too small to include the
wording that you can simply put the statement in the users manual.
Bill Fleury
-Original Message-
From: Peter Merguerian
E1 cable, which is 26 AWG, is 120 0hms and T1 is 100 ohms. Impedance will
vary depending on things such as; shielding, wire gauge, twists/ft, etc.
Bill Fleury
-Original Message-
From: William D'Orazio [mailto:dora...@cae.ca]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 8:49 AM
To: EMC Posting
Judging from the number of responses (0) I got to my question about EMI
problems from compactPCI backplanes I am assumiong that either no one uses
cPCI backplanes or I'm the only one that has experienced problems when
testing in this environment. I didn't think that ever happened in this
group.
Hi All,
This is a question regarding systems which use CompactPCI bus architecture.
On a cPCI backplane the PCI clock is routed to every slot on the backplane
with up to 7 peripheral slots possible on a normal backplane. My question is
this: With the cPCI specification calling out specific trace
17 matches
Mail list logo
