Re: [PSES] Warning Label: Disconnect from Mains

2015-05-05 Thread dougp01
in the loop. Thanks, - doug Douglas Powell http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01   Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.   Original Message   From: John Woodgate Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 11:04 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Reply To: John Woodgate Subject

Re: [PSES] Toy Directive

2015-05-05 Thread dougp01
injury. ‎Best, - dougDouglas Powellhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01Origin

Re: [PSES] Warning Label: Disconnect from Mains

2015-05-01 Thread dougp01
I agree with Colorado Brian. It seems that more and more, IEC-based standards are requiring a full explanation of symbols and warnings in the user documentation. As it turns out, many clients of mine leave the user manuals to the very last and they are usually very lacking. Where possible using

Re: [PSES] Warning Label: Disconnect from Mains

2015-05-01 Thread dougp01
From: Kunde, BrianSent: Friday, May 1, 2015 12:15 PMTo: dougp01; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGSubject: RE: [PSES] Warning Label: Disconnect from Mains Thanks Doug and Colorado Brian. We liked

Re: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions

2015-04-30 Thread dougp01
and accepting your CB report‎ definitely feels they have the authority to do as they please. And to a large extent this is true.   Having a CB report is not a foregone guarantee that it will always be accepted. ‎Regards, - doug Douglas Powell http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01     Original Message

Re: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions

2015-04-30 Thread dougp01
, or that changes to the C/C table in the TRF was rejected, or something else? Brian -Original Message- From: dougp01 [mailto:doug...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 5:53 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions Brian  I suggest you reference

Re: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions

2015-04-30 Thread dougp01
Try this link http://members.iecee.org/iecee/ieceemembers.nsf/ACRFList?readform ‎Doug.   Original Message   From: dougp01 Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 7:50 PM To: oconne...@tamuracorp.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions Brian, Rules for component

Re: [PSES] Schaffner net filter FN 2080

2015-04-15 Thread dougp01
.  Obviously, this still does not emulate the real ‎world but it may give you enough data to get a better understanding.   As already mentioned, in situ is ultimately the best way to go.   ‎All the best, Doug Douglas Powell http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01     Original Message   From: John

[PSES] EMI is a safety concern

2014-01-02 Thread dougp01
with public communication and the operation of essential equipment like gas pedals in cars. Here is another story along that line,http://www.interferencetechnology.com/ferry-crash-emi/Thanks, - dougDouglas Powellhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01

[PSES] IEC 61010-1 (2010) Altitude Correction for Clearances

2011-12-26 Thread dougp01
practice are appreciated, especially if any committee members were present during discussions on this particular point. thanks, –doug Douglas E Powell doug...@gmail.com 970-646-3732 http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01

Re: [PSES] CE marking of deep-fat fryer

2011-11-14 Thread dougp01
Never heard of this in Europe, for N.A. look at this video. http://www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/offerings/perspectives/consumer/productsafety/turkeys/ doug powell -Original Message- From: Pete Perkins Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 2:00 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: