Forwarded for Jun Nakamura.  Please include Mr. Nakamura
(nakamur...@naka.melco.co.jp) on any replies 
Dave Heald


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Product Safety - Japan
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 23:10:05 +0900
From: nakamur...@naka.melco.co.jp
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
References: <200105041727.naa21...@interlock2.lexmark.com>

George, John, Mark and group members:

Please see below.

geor...@lexmark.com wrote:
 
> The new Japan DENAN requirements are not completely clear,

I quite agree. I have got many information about DENAN requirements
because I work at a Japanese manufacturer but DENAN confuse and disgust
me. 

> and I know of no on-line source in English to clear up certain aspects.

You can see "KANPOH" dated on March 19 2001 which is Official journal of
the Japanese government but I don't know whether there is Enlgish
translated "KANPOH".
 
> For example, in the past, AC/DC adapters have required certification
> and the application of the Dentori-T mark with cert. number.  However,
> there was no mandatory Japan certification for most ITE end products,
> e.g. the laser and inkjet printers we market.

For most ITE end products like laser and inkjet printers,as you say,
the Dentori-T mark didn't need to be affixed to these products but
most electrical products sold in Japan including ITE end products
had to conform to DENTORI requirements,that is,most ITE end products
belonged to Category B(Self-Declaration and no Dentori-T mark)
under DENTORI law.
 
> The attached MS Word file refers to "specified products" (SP) and
> "non-specified products" (NSP), and lists 19 product "categories".
> However, it does not reveal if ITE might be included in categories 17
> (electronic appliances) or 18 (other electronic apparatuses), or even
> incuded at all as an SP or NSP product requiring certification.
>
> George

I'm not sure but I think most ITE end products belong to NSP because
I have heard that almost all in Category B under DENTORI law
were changed to NSP under DENAN law, therefore,for instance,
affixing PSE mark(PSE in a circle) and maintaining product inspection
records are needed.

JET which is one of conformity assessment bodies can judge
whether a product is in SP or NSP.
If you can see Japanese visiting http://www.jet.or.jp will probably be
a great help. If you can't then fax your question in English
to the number shown in the web page.   

Jun Nakamura
nakamur...@naka.melco.co.jp
MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
     Dave Heald                davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"


Reply via email to