Sent: donderdag 29 november 2001 18:35
To: vit...@aol.com; ri...@sdd.hp.com; xin...@cesi.ac.cn
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: clearance and working voltage]
I also agree with the 4.4mm reinforced and 2.2mm basic/supp. calculation.
I will assume that there is a creepage
;ri...@sdd.hp.com>, <xin...@cesi.ac.cn>
CC: <emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: clearance and working voltage]
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 21:51:04 EST
Rich and Xing,
No arguments from me about the clearance of 4.4 mm for reinforced. The other 6.4 mm clearance requi
Rich and Xing,
No arguments from me about the clearance of 4.4 mm for reinforced. The other
6.4 mm clearance requirement is probably a misapplication of the clarance rules
using the 840 v peak row of Table 3H.
I think the original question may also need to consider creepage requirements.
Hi Xing Weibing:
Here is my answer to the question.
Hi group I have a question regarding clearance and working voltage of
IEC60950. If I HAVE A AC ADAPTER(AC 100-240V 50/60Hz) ,THE WORKING
VOLTAGE MEASURED ARE AS FOLLOWS: Nominal supply voltage: AC240V PRIMARY
AND SECONDARY :
I read in !emc-pstc that David Heald davehe...@mediaone.net wrote (in
3c0512fd.7eb9...@mediaone.net) about '[Fwd: clearance and working
voltage]', on Wed, 28 Nov 2001:
Forwarded to the list for xingwb xin...@cesi.ac.cn.
Dave Heald
EMC-PSTC Admin
Begin forwarded message
Hi group I have
Forwarded to the list for xingwb xin...@cesi.ac.cn.
Dave Heald
EMC-PSTC Admin
Begin forwarded message
Hi group I have a question regarding clearance and working voltage of
IEC60950. If I HAVE A AC ADAPTER(AC 100-240V 50/60Hz) ,THE WORKING
VOLTAGE MEASURED ARE AS FOLLOWS: Nominal supply voltage:
6 matches
Mail list logo