From: Payne, Glyn
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 4:48 AM
To: ri...@ieee.org; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
Hi Richard,
Thanks for this.
The reason we tend to use a metal enclosure where possible is for ruggedisation
of 62368-1.
Best regards,
Glyn
From: Richard Nute
Reply-To:
Date: Wednesday, 22 May 2019 at 19:25
To: "'Payne, Glyn'" ,
Subject: RE: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
Hi Glyn:
You have the option of testing the bulkhead connectors in place (Annex S.1
as the certification report says
“minimum.”
Good luck, and best regards,
Rich
From: Payne, Glyn <0d283c0acebb-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 5:48 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
HI Lori,
Your interpre
Thank you.
From: Payne, Glyn <0d283c0acebb-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 8:40 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
Hi Experts,
I have a EN 62368-1 question regarding openings in a fire enclosure…
6.4
<0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
Reply-To: Pete Perkins
Date: Saturday, 18 May 2019 at 05:27
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
And if these connectors, such as a power socket, meet the component
requirements they are acceptable – w
k...@ieee.org
Entropy ain’t what it used to be
From: Nyffenegger, Dave
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 11:33 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
Bulkhead connectors protrude through fire enclosure openings both sides all the
time.
Bulkhead connectors protrude through fire enclosure openings both sides all the
time.
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 2:24 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
I would agree with you if it said
connectors protrude through fire enclosure openings both
sides all the time.
*From:*John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
*Sent:* Friday, May 17, 2019 2:24 PM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
I would agree with you if it said 'Material
equ...@ieee.org>
*Sent:* Friday, May 17, 2019 6:40 AM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
Hi Experts,
I have a EN 62368-1 question regarding openings in a fire enclosure…
*6.4.8.2.2 Requirements for a fire enclosure *
Material for components tha
C-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
Hi Experts,
I have a EN 62368-1 question regarding openings in a fire enclosure…
6.4.8.2.2 Requirements for a fire enclosure
Material for components that fill an opening in a fire enclosure or that is
in
er that you have
received this message in error. Then permanently delete all copies of the
message.
Thank you.
From: Payne, Glyn <0d283c0acebb-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 8:40 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
Hi
I would not agree with the test house. If their interpretation was mean,
the wording would be different.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
The UK is a sovereign state, not a Zollverein state
On 2019-05-17 14:40,
Hi Experts,
I have a EN 62368-1 question regarding openings in a fire enclosure…
6.4.8.2.2 Requirements for a fire enclosure
Material for components that fill an opening in a fire enclosure or that is
intended to be
mounted in such opening shall:
- comply with the
13 matches
Mail list logo
