Re: [PSES] Correct interpretation of EN 60950-1 or EN 62368-1

2020-11-24 Thread Douglas Powell
hain needs to be marked > > > > > > Best regards > > Charlie > > > > *Charlie Blackham* > > *Sulis Consultants Ltd* > > *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317* > > *Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/ <https://sulisconsultants.com/> * > > Registered

Re: [PSES] Correct interpretation of EN 60950-1 or EN 62368-1

2020-11-24 Thread Scott Xe
; > *Charlie Blackham* > > *Sulis Consultants Ltd* > > *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317* > > *Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/ <https://sulisconsultants.com/> * > > Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 > > > > *From:* Scott Xe > *Sent:* 24 No

Re: [PSES] Correct interpretation of EN 60950-1 or EN 62368-1

2020-11-24 Thread Charlie Blackham
interpretation of EN 60950-1 or EN 62368-1 Power rating under cl 1.7.1 of EN 60950-1 or cl F3.3 of EN 62368-1 states that "If a unit is not provided with a means for direct connection to a mains supply, it need not be marked with any electrical rating, such as its rated voltage, rated current or rated

[PSES] Correct interpretation of EN 60950-1 or EN 62368-1

2020-11-24 Thread Scott Xe
Power rating under cl 1.7.1 of EN 60950-1 or cl F3.3 of EN 62368-1 states that "If a unit is not provided with a means for direct connection to a mains supply, it need not be marked with any electrical rating, such as its rated voltage, rated current or rated power." In general, "input: 5 Vdc X