Re: [PSES] EN 55032 - and other EN standards

2018-11-30 Thread Michael Derby
[mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl] Sent: 27 November 2018 12:33 To: Michael Derby ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 55032 - and other EN standards Thank you Michael, You correctly emphasize the importance of a risk analysis in front of testing and standard selection. And as well

Re: [PSES] EN 55032 - and other EN standards

2018-11-27 Thread Gert Gremmen
Thank you Michael, You correctly emphasize the importance of a risk analysis in front of testing and standard selection. And as well as important the fact that one needs to declare compliance  directive, and not to the standard. But the directives almost always allow a manufacturer to

Re: [PSES] EN 55032 - and other EN standards

2018-11-27 Thread Michael Derby
That's a good summary from Gert. I think one important thing to remember is that the EU (LVD + EMCD, or RED) approach to compliance is the manufacturer assessing their device in any way possible, to show compliance with a Directive. It's not a certification to a standard. So, if a product