ct: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] FCC regulatory statements
The devil is in the details (FCC Rules Part 15.5). Comments below in [square
brackets] are mine.
1. This device may not cause harmful interference…. [to licensed devices.
Licensed devices are protected by the FCC Rules. T
quality.]
-Bob Sykes
*From:* Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
*Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2019 4:24 PM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [PSES] FCC regulatory statements
*CAUTION:*This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
not click links or open
: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 4:24 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PSES] FCC regulatory statements
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
STC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] FCC regulatory statements
Precisely. That's bureaucracy for you. Isn't there also a US law that requires
you to listen on a radio for Homeland Security broadcasts? Everyone is guilty
of something.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opi
gt; Large companies, on the other hand, may want to protect themselves from
> their suppliers by citing standards to be applied. But that should be up to
> them, not the government.
>
>
>
> Doug
>
> [image: SYMBOL]
>
>
>
> *From:* John Woodgate
> *Sent:* Thu
, not
the government.
Doug
[SYMBOL]
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 13:37
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] FCC regulatory statements
Precisely. That's bureaucracy for you. Isn't there also a US law that requires
you to listen on a radio for Homeland
the
widget.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: DEREK WALTON <00734758d943-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
Reply-To: DEREK WALTON
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:58:30 -0500
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] FCC regulatory statements
Hi Folks,
just a quick comment on the LED lights. ANSI has been workin
in this message that do not relate to the
> official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor
> endorsed by it.
>
> From: Richard Nute
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 4:24 PM
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Subjec
[PSES] FCC regulatory statements
“This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to
the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful
interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received,
including interference that may cause und
CC.
Ted Eckert
Microsoft Corporation
The opinions experessed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my
employer.
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 1:37 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] FCC regulatory statements
Precisely. That's bureau
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] FCC regulatory statements
“This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including
Precisely. That's bureaucracy for you. Isn't there also a US law that
requires you to listen on a radio for Homeland Security broadcasts?
Everyone is guilty of something.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On
“This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to
the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful
interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received,
including interference that may cause undesired operation”
Hmm.
13 matches
Mail list logo
