So, would having a DoC with a unique device ID imply the specific
device was tested to the standards listed - 100% production testing?
That would be cost prohibitive, not to mention degrading product
reliability in the case of line surge immunity testing.
Is there something in the recast that
message
From: Pat Lawler plawl...@gmail.com
Date:
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Recast of RTTE directive
So, would having a DoC with a unique device ID imply the specific
device was tested to the standards listed - 100% production testing?
That would be cost
In message 512c27c6.4020...@radiusnorth.net, dated Mon, 25 Feb 2013,
Scott Douglas sdoug...@radiusnorth.net writes:
So who do we complain to about having a unique DofC for each specific
product? How do we get our voices heard?
Contact your National Standards body, (i.e. ANSI, CSI, DIN,
we just do the sensible thing and drop this daft requirement.
T
- Original Message -
From: John Woodgate
Sent: 02/26/13 08:41 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Recast of RTTE directive
In message 512c27c6.4020...@radiusnorth.net, dated Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Scott
Douglas
Subject: Re: [PSES] Recast of RTTE directive
I'm with Scott on this and I appreciate John's advice about canvassing one's
relevant National Standards body.
However, I would like to understand who is driving and supporting the
rquirement for uniquely serialised DoC's and their motives
In message 20130226101739.148...@gmx.com, dated Tue, 26 Feb 2013,
Anthony Thomson ton...@europe.com writes:
So who is driving and supporting the requirement for uniquely
serialised DoC's and what is their technical and economical
justification for doing so.
Probably some enthusiastic
In message 2EC8CC67196B4ED1BB7595C6964E7620@LENVOR61iJOHN, dated Tue,
26 Feb 2013, John Cotman john.cot...@conformance.co.uk writes:
Surely if this is a real issue, (and I?m not convinced that it is), it
would have to be in the text of the directive(s), and is nothing to do
with standards?
'. Or maybe I've misuderstood the requirement... wouldn't be the first time
I got something wrong.
T
- Original Message -
From: John Cotman
Sent: 02/26/13 10:27 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Recast of RTTE directive
Surely if this is a real issue, (and I’m
: [PSES] Recast of RTTE directive
In message 2EC8CC67196B4ED1BB7595C6964E7620@LENVOR61iJOHN, dated Tue,
26 Feb 2013, John Cotman john.cot...@conformance.co.uk writes:
Surely if this is a real issue, (and I?m not convinced that it is), it
would have to be in the text of the directive(s
In message 7B529F5F748344499F9D6BA0A8C663C8@LENVOR61iJOHN, dated Tue,
26 Feb 2013, John Cotman john.cot...@conformance.co.uk writes:
It would defy all common sense if it got in. Among other matters,
there has to be a regulatory impact assessment of any new legislation.
But if people don't
hope you are smiling and crying at the same time.
The Other Brian
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Scott Douglas
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:11 PM
To: John Woodgate
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Recast of RTTE
-Original Message-
From: Scott Douglas [mailto:sdoug...@radiusnorth.net]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 9:11 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Recast of RTTE directive
I can tell you that trying to make a unique DofC for each individual unit
serial number is absolutely
In message
617eb8c8634c9149aa66c853d7b8ac53040e4...@by2prd0310mb389.namprd03.prod.o
utlook.com, dated Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Crane, Lauren
lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com writes:
The unique aspect of the problem here is that the unique DoC issue
seems embedded in the New Legislative Frame (NLF)
...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:03 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Recast of RTTE directive
In message d6ee39f37624ae40c6f7b6262384d...@mail.gmail.com, dated Fri,
22 Feb 2013, Peter Tarver ptar...@enphaseenergy.com writes:
errr...yeah. Got interrupted by work
...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Crane, Lauren
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:38 AM
To: John Woodgate; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Recast of RTTE directive
John, since you ask...(but perhaps you only meant the re-scoping)...
The RTTE recast is also be stepping forward
In message
617eb8c8634c9149aa66c853d7b8ac53040e3...@by2prd0310mb389.namprd03.prod.o
utlook.com, dated Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Crane, Lauren
lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com writes:
John, since you ask...(but perhaps you only meant the re-scoping)...
I did mean the re-scoping.
The RTTE recast is also
I can tell you that trying to make a unique DofC for each individual
unit serial number is absolutely unworkable. Not to mention a
documentation and logistics nightmare.
So who do we complain to about having a unique DofC for each specific
product? How do we get our voices heard?
Scott
On
PM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* [PSES] Recast of RTTE directive
The EU Commission has published a proposal for the recast of the RTTE
Directive, in part intended to bring it in line with the New Legislative
Framework.
Press release
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12
In message 62d7192f666b8ce8f331c708b4440...@mail.gmail.com, dated Fri,
22 Feb 2013, Peter Tarver ptar...@enphaseenergy.com writes:
I’m looking at the proposal now. What I gather from the first 8
pages (of 77) is that it removes all equipment not intentional
radiators from its scope (with an
errr...yeah. Got interrupted by work that pays my salary.
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 09:43
Fri,22 Feb 2013, Peter Tarver ptar...@enphaseenergy.com
writes:
I’m looking at the proposal now. What I gather from
the first 8
pages (of 77) is that it removes all
In message d6ee39f37624ae40c6f7b6262384d...@mail.gmail.com, dated Fri,
22 Feb 2013, Peter Tarver ptar...@enphaseenergy.com writes:
errr...yeah. Got interrupted by work that pays my salary.
Thanks. It looks like good news to me; does anyone see a snag?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See
the nerve our employers have - sheesh!!
oh... I think mine are on here too!!!
From: Peter Tarver ptar...@enphaseenergy.com
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:27 PM
Subject: RE: [PSES] Recast of RTTE directive
errr...yeah. Got
The EU Commission has published a proposal for the recast of the RTTE
Directive, in part intended to bring it in line with the New Legislative
Framework.
Press release
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-1109_en.htm
Regards,
Lauren Crane
KLA-Tencor
-
] Recast of RTTE directive
The EU Commission has published a proposal for the recast of the RTTE
Directive, in part intended to bring it in line with the New Legislative
Framework.
Press release
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-1109_en.htm
Regards,
Lauren Crane
KLA-Tencor
24 matches
Mail list logo
