1/29/24 7:05 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Reduce Speed of Moving Part to Reduce Risk
All valid points; however, I was taking my information from the
established ISO/IEC standards for machinery, with which I am
familiar. I do recall another standrd some years ag
des tables for allowable forces and pressures - both
>>>>> are needed - to determine if the robot 'crash' is within acceptable range.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, I have two clients using robots which are billed by their
>>>>> manufacturers as co
ng would be required.
Thanks,
Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Original message
From: Douglas Powell
Date: 1/29/24 7:05 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Reduce Speed of Moving Part to Reduce Risk
All valid points; however, I was taking my informa
>>> that specific application.
>>>
>>> In both cases they were confirmed collaborative.
>>>
>>> However, if the flat surface of the end effector was replaced with a
>>> needle, they would not be collaborative. They would be dangerous and
nal message
From: Douglas Powell
Date: 1/29/24 7:05 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Reduce Speed of Moving Part to Reduce Risk
All valid points; however, I was taking my information from the
established ISO/IEC standards for machinery, with which I am
fami
my T-Mobile 5G Device
>
>
> Original message
> From: Douglas Powell
> Date: 1/29/24 7:05 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Reduce Speed of Moving Part to Reduce Risk
>
> All valid points; however, I was taking my
as Powell
> *Sent:* Monday, January 29, 2024 7:04 PM
> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Reduce Speed of Moving Part to Reduce
> Risk
>
>
>
> All valid points; however, I was taking my information from the
> established ISO/IEC standards for
surface
area of contact. Lots of interesting equations.
Jim Hulbert
From: Douglas Powell
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 7:04 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Reduce Speed of Moving Part to Reduce Risk
All valid points; however, I was taking my information from
From: Douglas Powell
Date: 1/29/24 7:05 PM (GMT-05:00) To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re:
[PSES] Reduce Speed of Moving Part to Reduce Risk All valid points; however, I
was taking my information from the established ISO/IEC standards for machinery,
with which I am familiar. I do re
moving parts and area, but do not
> address the other parameters. Both introduce (to me) the concept of
> “force” on various body parts. I’m not sure of how this fits into this
> safety discussion.
>
>
>
> Consideration of speed alone is over-simplification.
>
>
>
>
this fits into this safety discussion.
Consideration of speed alone is over-simplification.
Best regards,
Rich
From: Doug Nix
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 11:16 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Reduce Speed of Moving Part to Reduce Risk
Hi Brian,
In the
Greetings All.
The IEC/EN 61010-1 table 12, Risk assessment of mechanical hazards to body
parts, states that a hazard can be avoidable if the speed of the motion was
reduced. Reduced to what speed?
It says, "The motion is visible and velocity is low enough for body parts
to be removed without bei
12 matches
Mail list logo
