: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 1:33 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Shrink-wrap on soldered connections
Group
I'm looking for examples of what would and would not be considered as
acceptable positioning or support devices for soldered connections.
Can shrink-wrap alone be considered
In message
blupr02mb11605ab82bb0e4da6f4c426c1...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook
.com, dated Wed, 11 Mar 2015, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com
writes:
Would be very interested in other's experience with crimped connector
failures.
Manual crimping tool used upside down.
--
OOO -
, March 11, 2015 12:55 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Shrink-wrap on soldered connections
Thought about this and realized that I have never seen crimped connector fail
where the connector components have test certificate, and where the crimping
tool is subject to recurring
failures.
Brian
From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen [mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 12:11 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Shrink-wrap on soldered connections
I agree with Gary, but the quality depends on wire type and match between wire
qualification as
an insulator. ??
Gert Gremmen
Ce-test
From: Gary McInturff [mailto:gary.mcintu...@esterline.com]
Sent: Tuesday 10 March 2015 20:14
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Shrink-wrap on soldered connections
I've seen the same, although I generally use
Group
I'm looking for examples of what would and would not be considered as
acceptable positioning or support devices for soldered connections.
Can shrink-wrap alone be considered to provide acceptable holding in place ,
particularly in the earth wire.
I think not, but would be grateful for
In message 002101d05b63$7b5f08a0$721d19e0$@ieee.org, dated Tue, 10 Mar
2015, Richard Nute ri...@ieee.org writes:
On certified products, I have seen shrink-wrap holding soldered
connections in place.
I agree. If the wire is terminated in a lug with a reasonable length of
'stem' that the
there is a small
cost difference in the piece part, but it's a better, in my opinion, method for
providing a secure double connection
mac
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:53 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Shrink-wrap on soldered
2:22 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Shrink-wrap on soldered connections
Concur. Two methods of securement are required for ground bond material
connections.
And assume that heat-shrink material is being referenced. Heat shrink is not
intended for this use, nor has any
Hi Charlie:
On certified products, I have seen shrink-wrap
holding soldered connections in place.
The shrink-wrap must attached to both the wire and
some other thing that holds the wire in place
should the solder connection fail. I have seen
the shrink wrap covering both the
Concur. Two methods of securement are required
for
ground bond material connections.
And mains connections. And any other connection
the failure of which would cause breach of the
safety standard requirements.
While safety standards often specify two methods
of securement, they don't specify
and insulator.
Brian
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:05 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Shrink-wrap on soldered connections
I'd think not,, especially earth wire connection unless the shrink wrap
manufacturer claims
12 matches
Mail list logo
