Gert-
You mention one possible reason for the test results is that the EUT's
have immunity deficits.
I agree, that is one possibility.
here are a few other possibilities:
(BTW- not affiliated in any way with medical devices nor with, all
comments OOO )
b)
Comment (e) is unrealistic. Assuming 61000-4-6 was applied, the amount of
power required to directly inject 1, 3 or 10 Volts oc into 150 Ohms is well
above the radiated power from an rf id device.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Conway, Patrick R
There’s a possibility, depending the cables and interface types in EUT, that
the 61000-4-6 test did not apply much current to the device.
Ari Honkala
SGS Fimko Oy
Finland
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ken Javor
Sent: 26.
Patricks point is well taken with regard to old equipment. However, if the
medical equipment is functioning as designed
then this throws the entire Medical Device Directive ( and all of its
associated immunity
testing) into question does it not?
After all when we test a unit for immunity the
4 matches
Mail list logo
