Good comment, Ed. We all depend on our reputations as competent technical
people that we can deliver the best product or service reasonable. Proper or
deficient equipment can make or break (respectively) the quality of our
well-intended work. Hence, knowledge of any weaknesses in a particular
From: Cortland Richmond 72146@compuserve.com
To: Grasso, Charles (Chaz) gra...@louisville.stortek.com; ieee pstc
list emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Antenna Calibration/Site Attenuation
Date: Monday, August 25, 1997 11:19 AM
If it's mutual coupling... sure. But if it's a surface wave
Calibration/Site Attenuation
Chrg: $0.00 Imp: Norm Sens: StdReceipt: NoParts: 1
Hi Cortland.
You asked:
(As an aside, can anyone here say if the COmmission has ever specifically ruled
on how far away from residences Class A equipment must be kept?
In my meanderings around the Compliance
/Site Attenuation
Chrg: $0.00 Imp: Norm Sens: StdReceipt: NoParts: 1
From: Cortland Richmond 72146@compuserve.com
To: Grasso, Charles (Chaz) gra...@louisville.stortek.com; ieee pstc
list emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Antenna Calibration/Site Attenuation
Date: Monday, August 25
variations with polarizations and geometries where
geometries is understood to mean test distances.
Don Umbdenstock
Sensormatic
--
From: chasgra...@aol.com
To: 72146@compuserve.com; chris_dup...@compuserve.com;
emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Antenna Calibration/Site Attenuation
List-Post
--- On Tue, 26 Aug 1997 08:12:00 -0400 UMBDENSTOCK, DON
umbdenst...@sensormatic.com wrote:
Great dialog, just the path that I was hoping would develop.
One thing I have learned since the question was first asked, all
biconical antennas are not made equal. The original antenna calibrated
* opinions expressed herein are personal,
and in no way reflect the position of Emulex Corporation.
--
From: ed.price[SMTP:ed.pr...@cubic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 1997 8:32 AM
To: UMBDENSTOCK, DON
Cc: 'EMC-PSTC Discussion Group'
Subject: Re: Antenna Calibration/Site Attenuation
***MESSAGE #2***
Ignore first message!!
***
This has turned into an interesting discussion.
1. On the question of Class A vs Class B etc.. I vaguely remember that the
genesis of the
Fax(303)661-7115
--
From: Cortland Richmond[SMTP:72146@compuserve.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 1997 1:53 PM
To:Thomas Donnelly; ieee pstc list
Subject: Re: Antenna Calibration/Site Attenuation
Tom,
Did you get to the presentation about getting the most out of a biconical
: Antenna Calibration/Site Attenuation
Chrg: $0.00 Imp: Norm Sens: StdReceipt: NoParts: 1
Hi,
Yes I attended that presentation.
In ANSI C63.4 Methods for SA there is a fudge factor for taking out
the mutual coupling between antennas for 3M SA measurements. Doesn't
this take care
Per ANSI C63.5 all calibrations are done with horizontal polarization, 2 meter
transmit antenna height, and 10 meter distance. Antenna factors measured in this
fashion should be utilized for measurements at 3, 10, or 30 meters either
horizontal or
vertical.
While on the surface it appears
11 matches
Mail list logo
