'
Subject: Re: IEC 60950 fire enclosure openings
My attempt to put aside the access rules got in the way of the question.
Another way of putting it is, if you have a solid top which overhangs the
bottom by the 5 degrees, there is no limit to the size of the side opening. It
appears the opening can
requirements. I am advising that
you cannot win with a certification house that
no side is required.
Best regards,
Rich
From: Robert Johnson [mailto:john...@itesafety.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 8:19 PM
To: ri...@ieee.org
Cc: 'ieee'
Subject: Re: IEC 60950 fire enclosure openings
60950 fire enclosure openings
I have come up with a question and will try to strip it to its essentials.
Consider a part which requires a fire enclosure, as a hypothetical example a
primary rectifier bridge with reinforced insulation. It is safe to touch, with
no live parts, so top openings
as not needing a fire
enclosure. This was my solution.
Best regards,
Rich
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Robert Johnson
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 6:18 PM
To: ieee
Subject: IEC 60950 fire enclosure openings
I have come up with a question and will try to strip
I have come up with a question and will try to strip it to its essentials.
Consider a part which requires a fire enclosure, as a hypothetical example a
primary rectifier bridge with reinforced insulation. It is safe to touch, with
no live parts, so top openings or side access is not restricted. A
5 matches
Mail list logo
