In message
28aa7ba6b8bc04409c3272690562b639016b6...@ausx3mps308.aus.amer.dell.com,
dated Thu, 19 Feb 2009, kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com writes:
From the voting results on the second CDV, I?d surmise there is a
significant amount of controversy and expect the new standard will be
interesting
: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Pickard, Ron
Sent: 19 February 2009 16:10
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: IEC 62368 status?
To all,
What is the current status of IEC 62368? Is there an FDIS yet? How is the
voting going? What issues are the voters having with it, other
...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Pickard, Ron
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:10 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: IEC 62368 status?
To all,
What is the current status of IEC 62368? Is there an FDIS yet? How is the
voting going? What issues are the voters having with it, other than
To all,
What is the current status of IEC 62368? Is there an FDIS yet? How is the
voting going? What issues are the voters having with it, other than the
candle flame test? Is it still set to be published in early 2009 or is a delay
likely?
A general status update is requested and
4 matches
Mail list logo
