Re: Re: Immunity testing mitigations

2003-11-14 Thread T.Sato
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:38:01 +0100 (CET), r...@rpgarner.freeserve.co.uk wrote: Be warned, something like this was tried by a UK manufacturer. They failed the tests, then persauded a Competent body to sign off a TCF stating that the failed tests were not applicable or were unpassable by

Re: Re: Immunity testing mitigations

2003-11-14 Thread r...@rpgarner.freeserve.co.uk
passed. And their equipment did pass after redesign. Regards Ray Garner EMC Consultant WRSL Message date : Nov 13 2003, 05:47 PM From : rehel...@mmm.com To : T.Sato Copy to : emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject : Re: Immunity testing mitigations On 12 Nov 2003, Tom wrote If you are so

Re: Immunity testing mitigations

2003-11-13 Thread rehel...@mmm.com
On 12 Nov 2003, Tom wrote If you are so sure that your product complies with the protection requirements of the EMC Directive even if it failed to pass the test, you have chance to use TCF Route instead of the Standard Route. Regards, Tom Tom, could you explain your thinking on this a little

Re: Immunity testing mitigations

2003-11-12 Thread T.Sato
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 07:43:28 -0500, Bill Flanigan bflani...@ameritherm.com wrote: I'm embarking on a CE test-cycle under EN61326 and I wonder... If I encounter problems under EFT, Burst or Vdips/interruptions, what mitigating steps are available? If you are so sure that your product

Immunity testing mitigations

2003-11-12 Thread Bill Flanigan
Lurkers and posters, I'm embarking on a CE test-cycle under EN61326 and I wonder... If I encounter problems under EFT, Burst or Vdips/interruptions, what mitigating steps are available? If you could point me to any FAQ-type literature or EMC website for this info, that would be very helpful...