/emc_radio_frequency/current_injection_probes_clamps/PCJ_9201B_e.pdf
This will also result in slightly less power being needed to perform the test.
Bob R.
--- On Thu, 1/20/11, David wrote:
From: David
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 61000-4-6 calibration
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
analyser) and take its value into
account by further reducing the expected Umr.
Cheers,
John
From: David [mailto:barid61...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 20 January 2011 20:54
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 61000-4-6 calibration
Ok, so to be perfectly clear, the level I need
20, 2011 2:45:16 PM
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 61000-4-6 calibration
John,
Yes, calibration to 61000-4-6 makes more sense when thinking in terms of
voltage, especially since the limits are specified that way.
The 50 ohm transmission line I was referring to was the 50 ohm BCI calibration
fixture
fixture and
150-50 ohm adapters) as a 150 ohm system.
Cheers,
Bob R.
--- On Thu, 1/20/11, John Davies, Blackwood Labs
wrote:
From: John Davies, Blackwood Labs
Subject: RE: [PSES] EN 61000-4-6 calibration
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Date: Thursday, January
From: Bob Richards [mailto:b...@toprudder.com]
Sent: 20 January 2011 18:27
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 61000-4-6 calibration
John,
You did a better job of explaining it than I did. :-)
>>>You are correct that these maximum current levels into th
flows through both.
Bob R.
--- On Thu, 1/20/11, John Davies, Blackwood Labs
wrote:
From: John Davies, Blackwood Labs
Subject: RE: [PSES] EN 61000-4-6 calibration
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2011, 11:11 AM
not comment on ISO 11452-4.
Best Regards,
John
From: Bob Richards [mailto:b...@toprudder.com]
Sent: 19 January 2011 18:56
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 61000-4-6 calibration
David,
If you are calibrating in a 50 ohm system, it is a 100 ohm loop.
The e
7 matches
Mail list logo
