Still better, only important chatter should be posted. I have just violated
my suggestion.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Coyle [mailto:jco...@norsat.com]
Sent: 10 March, 2000 5:15 PM
To: 'Robert Legg'; 'IEEE EMC-PSTC Forum'
Subject: RE: EMC and product safety split?
A better
: EMC and product safety split? (Document link not converted)
Paul, Please post my comments to the PSTC listserver.
I vote for splitting EMC PSTC and promoting an IEEE Product Safety Society.
I am a member and past-president of the Northeast Product Safety Society
(non-IEEE) chapter of the PSTC
.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Gary McInturff [mailto:gmcintu...@telect.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 10:46 AM
To: 'Mark Schmidt'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: EMC and product safety split?
Mike,
I gotta stick up for the question and the discussion. This forum
that are
applicaple for my needs and delete those that are not.
Bob Chaplis
Genrad.
-Original Message-
From: John Radomski [SMTP:john_radom...@inter-tel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 9:56 AM
To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
Subject: RE: EMC and product safety split
[mailto:mschm...@xrite.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 5:25 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:RE: EMC and product safety split?
One way to cut down on mail traffic would be not having to
read this type
@interlock.lexmark.com on 03/15/2000 09:59:04 AM
Please respond to mmatejic%foxboro@interlock.lexmark.com
To: emc-pstc%ieee@interlock.lexmark.com
cc:(bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: RE: EMC and product safety split?
I don't think we should split EMC and Safety distribution
I don't think we should split EMC and Safety distribution lists.
We could refrain from posting humorous and similar messages unrelated to
EMC and Safety.
Mirko
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc
Keep them together.
John Radomski
Compliance Engineer
Inter-Tel Integrated Systems
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
One way to cut down on mail traffic would be not having to read this type of
discussion thread.
I know the reason I subscribed was based on content relating to both EMC and
Safety. This forum has been very helpful for establishing quality
engineering practices to enhance design, based on the
]
Sent: 15. mars 2000 10:07
To:emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: EMC and product safety split?
My vote is
My Vote is definitely against a split - like many others I have a wide
regulatory/standards brief to cover and - for example - EMC safety are
not totally different subjects as you
My vote is
My Vote is definitely against a split - like many others I have a wide
regulatory/standards brief to cover and - for example - EMC safety are
not totally different subjects as you generally cannot CE Mark a product
for one without the other.
John Allen
Racal Defence Electronics
I dont think we should split
Andy Mullan
-Original Message-
From: Richard A. Schumacher [mailto:schum...@valencia.rsn.hp.com]
Sent: 14 March 2000 20:57
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: EMC and product safety split?
I vote for splitting them. EMC and safety are different subjects
I vote for splitting them. EMC and safety are different subjects.
regards,
Richard Schumacher
Hewlett Packard Company
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your
...@ma.ultranet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 10:00 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: EMC and product safety split?
If the group is split, common and peripheral topics would have to be
sent to both groups. Those interested in one topic would have less to
sort through, but those interested
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:34:39 -0800, tgr...@lucent.com wrote:
If this is becoming an issue, I would like to recommend that the Subject
header in the e-mail be preceded by either EMC: or SAF: followed by the
subject.This way, persons not interested in one or the other could
easily delete the
If the group is split, common and peripheral topics would have to be
sent to both groups. Those interested in one topic would have less to
sort through, but those interested in both would have to filter
duplicates.
I see no total gain but added administrative burdens.
Don't ask for subject
.
badep...@jetstream.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf
Of Rich Nute
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 12:15 PM
To: Product Safety Technical Committee
Subject: Re: EMC and product safety split?
Regarding a possible EMC
and product safety split?
I concur with the comments from K. Richardson, Chris Dupres, Kaz Gawrzyjal,
and Tania.
Let's keep EMC-PSTC As Is for now.
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list
discussions going!
Thx
-Original Message-
From: rehel...@mmm.com [mailto:rehel...@mmm.com]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 7:21 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EMC and product safety split?
I would NOT like to see a split as well
...@tectrol.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: EMC and product safety split?
Hi Rob.
You wrote:
Is there any possibility of getting the EMC and product safety postings
partitioned ~ to assist in cutting surplus mail traffic?
The name of the List is EMC-PSTC, (ElectroMagnetic Compatbility - Product
Safety
I would NOT like to see a split as well.
==
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
)
Subject: Re: EMC and product safety split
Subject: Re: EMC and product safety split?
Regarding a possible EMC and product safety split...
I want to thank each of your for your contributions to this
topic. As with our technical discussions, your comments are
of high quality and are highly worthwhile and thought-provoking.
Each
Regarding a possible EMC and product safety split...
I want to thank each of your for your contributions to this
topic. As with our technical discussions, your comments are
of high quality and are highly worthwhile and thought-provoking.
Each of your technical contributions make this forum
All,
After reading several responses on this, I'll throw my two cents in
Since my main interests are in high performance physical system design and
integration, EMC and signal integrity design (among others) are foremost
in my
interests, so design issues are of primary importance to me and
I also do not agree splitting this group into EMC and Safety is a good
thing.
I agree with comments from Chris Dupres and others that topical discussion
in this group is wider than just EMC and Safety. I would hope that it
remains so. Between this group and the TREG group as far as I am
Forum; 'Robert Legg'
Subject: RE: EMC and product safety split?
If this is becoming an issue, I would like to recommend that the Subject
header in the e-mail be preceded by either EMC: or SAF: followed by the
subject.This way, persons not interested in one or the other could
easily delete
Robert Legg wrote:
Is there any possibility of getting the EMC and
product safety postings partitioned ~ to assist
in cutting surplus mail traffic?
In my opinion, this would be not good.
Several reasons:
First - I've been involved with this and other
newsgroups for several years.
Hi Rob.
You wrote:
Is there any possibility of getting the EMC and product safety postings
partitioned ~ to assist in cutting surplus mail traffic?
The name of the List is EMC-PSTC, (ElectroMagnetic Compatbility - Product
Safety Technical Committee) i.e. it' covers all the material required
In a message dated 3/10/00, Steve Phillips writes:
EMC gets a lot more traffic (if appears
to me anyway) - and I am more concerned with
safety, which leaves me filtering and deleting a
lot more messages than I would like to have to -
it wouldn't be so bad if EMC and Safety messages
A better solution, if possible would be a digest format sent on a daily
basis.
John Coyle
Engineering Manager,
Cable Products .
Tel: 604-292-9161
fax: 604-292-9010
jco...@norsat.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf
Of Robert
Robert,
Not sure that partioning would reduce traffic. Might actually
increase it, since many compliance engineers deal with both EMC and
safety. In several cases, issues arise where both EMC and safety need
to be addressed.
Eric Petitpierre
32 matches
Mail list logo
