Gert,
As a relative newcomer to the world of EMC compliance, please allow
me to question your statement below to clear things up in my own mind.
I thought that as a manufacturer, we have the option of EITHER:
a) declaring conformity against an appropriate standard
or
b) preparing a
Don,
I had a look through the ITE immunity spec EN55024 to see if
it contained a better definition of acceptability. Section 7 defines
performance criteria, and places the level of acceptability as that
defined by the manufacturer. If it is not defined by the manufacturer,
then it is what the
Don,
The manufacturer defines the acceptable level of degradation. It must be
consistent
through out all the reports on your products.
When I test my products I specify that the image must be 'clearly
discernable' (i.e. if you can see the image of a person, but you can't
easily tell whether it's
The solution is to be found in the Criteria being
defined for transients tests.
EN 50082-1 defines criterion B for EFT testing.
Performance loss (full loss) is allowed , but only if the equipment
is self restoring it's mode of operation after the test.
The authors of the 130-4 did have the
4 matches
Mail list logo
