: Re: Australia C-Tick and safety requirements
Hi Dan:
As far as question 2 is concerned (line frequency devices CISPR 22),
CISPR 22 does address it.
The Introduction says:
The scope is extended to the whole radio-frequency range from 9 kHz to
400 GHz, . . . . 50Hz is below the range.
It also
consequence of its use.
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Pickard,
Ron
Sent: Saturday, 21 February 2009 4:34 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: Australia C-Tick and safety requirements
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Kevin
Richardson
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 4:07 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: Australia C-Tick and safety requirements
All,
A couple of clarifications may be helpful.
EMC Requirements
Australian
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: Australia C-Tick and safety requirements
Hi Kevin,
Thank you for your detailed and informative reply.
Please note that I agree with you completely about the EMC Handbook.
Although
...@yahoo.com ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG ; Dan Roman
mailto:dan.ro...@dialogic.com
Sent: Saturday, 21 February 2009 3:46 AM
Subject: RE: Australia C-Tick and safety requirements
Peter,
I have been researching this issue also. Can you tell me what
Australian
- Original Message -
From: Pickard, Ron mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Saturday, 21 February 2009 4:34 AM
Subject: RE: Australia C-Tick and safety requirements
Dan, Jim et al,
I believe
Hi Dan:
As far as question 2 is concerned (line frequency devices CISPR 22),
CISPR 22 does address it.
The Introduction says:
The scope is extended to the whole radio-frequency range from 9 kHz to
400 GHz, . . . . 50Hz is below the range.
It also says in the Scope:
Procedures are given for
For safety, this is not a perscribed equipment and therefore does not require
a safety approval from a state authority
However, the product must still comply with the Australia safety requirements
in AS/NZS 60950.1. This standard is harmonized with IEC60950-1 so if you
comply with the standard
AS/NZS 60950 on the Declaration of Conformity?
Regards,
Jim Robson
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of peter
merguerian
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 7:43 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; Dan Roman
Subject: Re: Australia C-Tick
: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:47 AM
To: pmerguerian2...@yahoo.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; Dan Roman
Subject: RE: Australia C-Tick and safety requirements
Peter,
I have been researching this issue also. Can you tell me what Australian
document says that C-tick marked ITE (non-Telco
: RE: Australia C-Tick and safety requirements
To: pmerguerian2...@yahoo.com, EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG, Dan Roman
dan.ro...@dialogic.com
Date: Friday, February 20, 2009, 8:46 AM
Peter,
I have been researching this issue also. Can you
11 matches
Mail list logo
