From: John Woodgate
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:49 PM
Jim Bacher writes:
For some products the Post Office has additional requirements.
Bullet-proofing? (;-)
John Woodgate
smudge, crinkle and mangle can not be disabled.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
I forgot to mention that Canada also has laws that require safety approvals.
The electrical inspectors in Ontario have a reputation for finding and
preventing the installation of non compliant products. I do not have the
information on the laws, only that they exist.
Jim
-
This message is
In message 006601c62865$79471f70$6b01a8c0@HP29375324311, dated Thu, 2
Feb 2006, Rich Nute jan...@fastwave.net writes
For some products the Post Office has additional requirements.
Bullet-proofing? (;-)
No. Protecting the turf!
Remember the old days of British Telecom? They had their own
For some products the Post Office has additional requirements.
Bullet-proofing? (;-)
No. Protecting the turf!
Remember the old days of British Telecom? They had
their own safety standards, one for the equipment they
bought, and another for the equipment they bought for
connection to the
In message
b6b5121c81b9f4439ea67976da52b0540554e...@titanium.miamisburg.paxar-am.co
m, dated Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Jim Bacher jim.bac...@paxar.com writes
For some products the Post Office has additional requirements.
Bullet-proofing? (;-)
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and
As for a link try:
http://landru.leg.state.or.us/ors/479.html
For some products the Post Office has additional requirements.
As for RF, both IC (Industry Canada) and FCC both have RF emission
standards. The requirements apply to anything that has a clock that is 9kHz
or faster.
Sometime
: RE: EMC, Safety for Machinery USA, CANADA, Russia
Did you get the answers you were looking for?
---
---
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of M.
Loerzer-Mobile (GLOBALNORM)
Sent
- Original Message -
From: Jim mailto:jim.bac...@paxar.com Bacher
To: 'M. Loerzer-Mobile mailto:loerzer_mob...@globalnorm.de (GLOBALNORM)'
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 5:07 PM
Subject: RE: EMC, Safety for Machinery USA, CANADA, Russia
Did you get the answers you were looking
In message 000801c6250b$bf837810$6402a8c0@MichaelMobile, dated Sun, 29
Jan 2006, M. Loerzer-Mobile (GLOBALNORM)
loerzer_mob...@globalnorm.de writes
does anybody know the applicable machinery regulations (if exist) to
the
•Machinery Directive 98/37/EC,
•EMC-Directive 89/336/EEC and the
•Low
9 matches
Mail list logo
