Re: EMC test chamber -- Reverberation and Others

Barry, NIST has put lots of effort to promote RC and achieved significant results through experimental approach. They deserved the honor of the best symposium paper. However, I guess we are the first team to study RC through modeling simulation approach building the 3-D RC model and obtaining

RE: EMC test chamber -- Reverberation and Others

To: b...@anritsu.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject:Re: EMC test chamber -- Reverberation and Others Thanks Barry for the suggestion but I know nothing about reverberation chambers, possibly somone could comment on the merits of RC over AC

Re: EMC test chamber -- Reverberation and Others

Leslie, Thanks for the valuable info. You mentioned two articles in EMC'99 Seattle Symposium Record. Actually, right before them on pp. 1-6 of Vol. 1 is Reverberation Chamber Relationship: Corrections and Improvements by John Ladbury and Galen Koepke, which won the award of the best

RE: EMC test chamber -- Reverberation and Others

To: b...@anritsu.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject:Re: EMC test chamber -- Reverberation and Others Thanks Barry for the suggestion but I know nothing about reverberation chambers, possibly somone could comment on the merits of RC

Re: EMC test chamber -- Reverberation and Others

I have studied Reverberation Chambers for some time, refer to recent EMC'99 Seattle Symposium Record Vol. 1, Page 7 to page 16. Measurement comparison will be published in the near future. Cost: RC is about 20 to 30% of an equivalent AC. Standards: There is a joint CISPR (emissions) and IEC

Re: EMC test chamber -- Reverberation and Others

Thanks Barry for the suggestion but I know nothing about reverberation chambers, possibly somone could comment on the merits of RC over AC. Ray Levasseur EMC Compliance Creo Products From: b...@anritsu.com (Bailin Ma) Reply-To: b...@anritsu.com (Bailin Ma) To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: