Re: EN61000-3-3 -3-11 off topic a bit!

2002-11-01 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Spencer, David H david.spen...@usa.xerox.com wrote (in 052106A55179D611B34300096BB02E3F8B99@USAMCMS4) about 'EN61000-3-3 -3-11 off topic a bit!' on Thu, 31 Oct 2002: I've just looked at all the draft copies of this standard(that I have), and the older version TR IEC

RE: EN61000-3-3 -3-11 off topic a bit!

2002-10-31 Thread David Heald
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: EN61000-3-3 -3-11 off topic a bit! I've just looked at all the draft copies of this standard(that I have), and the older version TR IEC 1000-3-5. Still only says 75amps. Again no per phase. I would have to say if TC77A wanted it to say 75A per phase

RE: EN61000-3-3 -3-11 off topic a bit!

2002-10-31 Thread Spencer, David H
I've just looked at all the draft copies of this standard(that I have), and the older version TR IEC 1000-3-5. Still only says 75amps. Again no per phase. I would have to say if TC77A wanted it to say 75A per phase, it would be in there. Regards Dave Spencer -Original Message-

RE: EN61000-3-3 -3-11 off topic a bit!

2002-10-30 Thread Spencer, David H
Having looked into EN61000-3-11, there is a big difference from EN61000-3-3. The scope of 3-3 refers to products rated 16 amps or less per phase. There is no per phase specification in EN61000-3-11. Only this in the title: equipment with rated current 75 A. Further, the scope does not specify