I haven’t seen one.
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of McDougal, Bret
(SHC US)
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:52 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: FCC Part 68 Gold Plating -- Ethernet Lan
The question has come up whether there
In message
ffc63409f873ea4781b7bcba0d015a56057b2...@usnwk100msx.ww017.siemens.net,
dated Tue, 1 Jul 2008, McDougal, Bret (SHC US)
bret.mcdou...@siemens.com writes:
The question has come up whether there are any requirements on the gold
plating thickness for Ethernet Connectors (not used for
On 7/1/2008, Bret McDougal wrote:
The question has come up whether there are any requirements on the gold
plating thickness for Ethernet Connectors (not used for telco interface),
similar to the requirements for 50u of Gold for Telco connections.
Hi Bret:
I suspect that the answer
In message 6.1.0.6.2.20080701131509.03cc0...@pop.randolph-telecom.com,
dated Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Joe Randolph j...@randolph-telecom.com writes:
That being said, I would be inclined to use gold plating, at least in a
thin coating, to avoid the type of corrosion problems that FCC Part 68
was
...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: FCC Part 68 Gold Plating -- Ethernet Lan
In message 6.1.0.6.2.20080701131509.03cc0...@pop.randolph-telecom.com,
dated Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Joe Randolph j...@randolph-telecom.com writes:
That being said, I would be inclined to use gold plating, at least in a
thin coating, to avoid
your system. Thank
you for your cooperation.
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:05 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: FCC Part 68 Gold Plating -- Ethernet Lan
In message 6.1.0.6.2.20080701131509.03cc0...@pop.randolph
6 matches
Mail list logo
