RE: Got another beef about an NRTL (haven't we all?)

2000-10-26 Thread Peter Tarver
At one time or another, we certainly all do. Each NRTL has its own level of absurdity, whether by being too harsh or too lax. There is one NRTL the international safety community of a previous employer had agreed was lax to the point of not accepting any component or OEM device that certified

RE: Got another beef about an NRTL (haven't we all?)

2000-10-26 Thread Grant, Tania (Tania)
(Tania)'; 'Loop, Robert' Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Got another beef about an NRTL (haven't we all?) On Component Recognition: 1) I can certainly sympathize with an NRTL reserving the right to reject another NRTL's component recognition/certification. After all, an NRTL has

RE: Got another beef about an NRTL (haven't we all?)

2000-10-25 Thread Mel Pedersen
Solutions -Original Message- From: Loop, Robert [ mailto:rl...@hnt.wylelabs.com mailto:rl...@hnt.wylelabs.com ] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 9:58 AM To: tgr...@lucent.com Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Got another beef about an NRTL (haven't we all?) Hi Tania, At Wyle

RE: Got another beef about an NRTL (haven't we all?)

2000-10-25 Thread Dan Kinney (A)
Bravo Robert - you're right on the mark. Dan Kinney Horner APG -Original Message- From: Loop, Robert [SMTP:rl...@hnt.wylelabs.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 11:58 AM To: tgr...@lucent.com Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Got another beef about an NRTL

RE: Got another beef about an NRTL (haven't we all?)

2000-10-25 Thread Grant, Tania (Tania)
, Robert [ mailto:rl...@hnt.wylelabs.com mailto:rl...@hnt.wylelabs.com ] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 9:58 AM To: tgr...@lucent.com Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Got another beef about an NRTL (haven't we all?) Hi Tania, At Wyle Laboratories (one of the many NRTL's), we

RE: Got another beef about an NRTL (haven't we all?)

2000-10-25 Thread Loop, Robert
Hi Tania, At Wyle Laboratories (one of the many NRTL's), we typically will accept test data from another NRTL. Our assumption is that other NRTL demonstrated proficiency to OSHA requirements and probably many others (A2LA, NVLAP, ISO Guide 25, etc.), hence their test data is assumed to be